From: Florian Fainelli <florian@openwrt.org>
To: Greg Ungerer <gerg@snapgear.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, gerg@uclinux.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] net: allow FEC driver to not have attached PHY
Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2010 15:24:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201010071524.43789.florian@openwrt.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201010070350.o973oGFE026910@goober.internal.moreton.com.au>
Hi,
On Thursday 07 October 2010 05:50:16 Greg Ungerer wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have a board with a ColdFire SoC on it with the built-in FEC
> ethernet module. On this hardware the FEC eth output is directly
> attached to a RTL8305 4-port 10/100 switch. There is no conventional
> PHY, the FEC output is direct into the uplink port of the switch
> chip.
>
> This setup doesn't work after the FEC code was switch to using
> phylib. The driver used to have code to bypass phy detection/setup
> for this particular board. The phylib probe finds nothing, and of
> course sets a no-link condition.
>
> So, what is the cleanest way to support this?
If phy detection fails and you cannot attach to a known PHY driver, you could
register a fixed-PHY driver wich will report the link to be up. I had to do
something like this for the cpmac driver[1] where various switches and
external PHY configurations are supported.
[1]:
https://dev.openwrt.org/browser/trunk/target/linux/ar7/patches-2.6.35/972-
cpmac_multi_probe.patch
>
> The attached patch adds a config option to do this sort of generically
> for the FEC driver. But I am wondering if there isn't a better way?
>
> Regards
> Greg
>
>
> ---
>
> [RFC] net: allow FEC driver to not have attached PHY
>
> At least one board using the FEC driver does not have a conventional
> PHY attached to it, it is directly connected to a somewhat simple
> ethernet switch (the board is the SnapGear/LITE, and the attached
> 4-port ethernet switch is a RealTek RTL8305). This switch does not
> present the usual register interface of a PHY, it presents nothing.
> So a PHY scan will find nothing.
>
> After the FEC driver was changed to use phylib for supporting phys
> it no longer works on this particular board/switch setup.
>
> Add a config option to allow configuring the FEC driver to not expect
> a PHY to be present.
>
> Signed-off-by: Greg Ungerer <gerg@uclinux.org>
> ---
> drivers/net/Kconfig | 9 +++++++++
> drivers/net/fec.c | 7 +++++++
> 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/Kconfig b/drivers/net/Kconfig
> index 93494e2..ee44728 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/net/Kconfig
> @@ -1934,6 +1934,15 @@ config FEC2
> Say Y here if you want to use the second built-in 10/100 Fast
> ethernet controller on some Motorola ColdFire processors.
>
> +config FEC_NOPHY
> + bool "FEC has no attached PHY"
> + depends on FEC
> + help
> + Some boards using the FEC driver may not have a PHY directly
> + attached to it. Typically in this scenario the FEC output is
> + directly connected to the input of an ethernet switch or hub.
> + Say Y here if your hardware is like this.
> +
> config FEC_MPC52xx
> tristate "MPC52xx FEC driver"
> depends on PPC_MPC52xx && PPC_BESTCOMM
> diff --git a/drivers/net/fec.c b/drivers/net/fec.c
> index 768b840..3637f89 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/fec.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/fec.c
> @@ -910,6 +910,11 @@ fec_enet_open(struct net_device *dev)
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_FEC_NOPHY
> + /* No PHY connected, assume link is always up */
> + fep->link = 1;
> + fec_restart(dev, 0);
> +#else
> /* Probe and connect to PHY when open the interface */
> ret = fec_enet_mii_probe(dev);
> if (ret) {
> @@ -917,6 +922,8 @@ fec_enet_open(struct net_device *dev)
> return ret;
> }
> phy_start(fep->phy_dev);
> +#endif
> +
> netif_start_queue(dev);
> fep->opened = 1;
> return 0;
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-07 13:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-07 3:50 [RFC] net: allow FEC driver to not have attached PHY Greg Ungerer
2010-10-07 13:11 ` Ben Hutchings
2010-10-08 5:58 ` Greg Ungerer
2010-10-07 13:24 ` Florian Fainelli [this message]
2010-10-08 5:57 ` Greg Ungerer
2010-10-07 13:28 ` Simon Farnsworth
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201010071524.43789.florian@openwrt.org \
--to=florian@openwrt.org \
--cc=gerg@snapgear.com \
--cc=gerg@uclinux.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).