From: <Narendra_K@Dell.com>
To: <kay.sievers@vrfy.org>
Cc: <greg@kroah.com>, <Matt_Domsch@Dell.com>,
<netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>, <Jordan_Hargrave@Dell.com>,
<Vijay_Nijhawan@Dell.com>, <Charles_Rose@Dell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] Use firmware provided index to register a network interface
Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2010 11:44:57 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101007184440.GA2999@libnet-test.oslab.blr.amer.dell.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinP5WPDPvk+kq8vsyP=xC9qcoe+c=1EBp0XJNPk@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Oct 07, 2010 at 10:35:14PM +0530, Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 18:48, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 07, 2010 at 11:31:13AM -0500, Matt Domsch wrote:
> >> 1) SMBIOS type 41 method. Windows does not use this today, and I
> >> can't speak to their future plans. Narendra's kernel patch does,
> >> as has biosdevname, the udev helper we first wrote for this
> >> purpose, for several years.
> >
> > Then stick with that udev helper please :)
>
> What about just exporting this information in sysfs, and not touch the
> naming?
>
> Anyway, I'm pretty sure all of this naming of onboard devices should
> happen only at install time, or from a system management tool and not
> at hotplug time.
>
> We should not get confused by the way the (very simple)
> automatic-rule-creater for persistent netdev naming in udev works.
> This is really just a tool for the common case, and works fine for the
> majority of people.
Right. It works as the automatic rule creator saves the snapshot of the
registered network interfaces at run time.
>
> I'm not sure, if we should put all these special use cases in the
> hotplug path. I mean it's not that people add and remove 4 port
> network cards with special BIOS all the time, and expect proper naming
> on the first bootup, right? The installer, or the system management
> tool could just create/edit udev rules to provide proper device naming
> on whatever property is available at a specific hardware, be it the
> MAC address or some other persistent match?
>
The proposal made is not expecting deterministic naming when an add-in
card with 'N' ports is plugged in/out. It is specific to onboard devices
only. Expectation is onboard devices have deterministic naming at first
bootup. And no special BIOS required as SMBIOS tables are in use for
sometime now.
I did explore using rules based on the exported attribute ATTRS{index}
on a system with 4 Onboard devices and two add-in devices.(where add-in
device becomes eth0 and eth1)
# PCI device 0x14e4:0x164c (bnx2) (custom name provided by external
# tool) SUBSYSTEM=="net", ACTION=="add", DRIVERS=="?*",
# ATTRS{index}=="1", ATTR{type}=="1", KERNEL=="eth*", NAME="eth0"
(and similary for eth1..eth3)
And for add-in devices.
# PCI device 0x8086:0x10c9 (igb) (custom name provided by external tool)
# SUBSYSTEM=="net", ACTION=="add", DRIVERS=="?*",
# ATTR{address}=="00:1b:21:54:33:3c", ATTR{type}=="1", KERNEL=="eth*",
# NAME="eth4" (and similar for eth5 as they do not have an index)
This works as i edited the file manually.
If this has to be done on a large number of systems where an image
based deployment is preferred, getting onboard device names as expected
is an issue and is important.
--
With regards,
Narendra K
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-07 18:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-07 14:23 [PATCH V2] Use firmware provided index to register a network interface Narendra_K
2010-10-07 15:11 ` Greg KH
2010-10-07 16:31 ` Matt Domsch
2010-10-07 16:48 ` Greg KH
2010-10-07 17:05 ` Kay Sievers
2010-10-07 17:15 ` Greg KH
2010-10-07 17:44 ` Narendra_K
2010-10-07 18:44 ` Narendra_K [this message]
2010-10-07 20:42 ` Matt Domsch
2010-10-07 16:49 ` David Lamparter
2010-10-07 17:13 ` Kay Sievers
2010-10-07 16:14 ` Stephen Hemminger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101007184440.GA2999@libnet-test.oslab.blr.amer.dell.com \
--to=narendra_k@dell.com \
--cc=Charles_Rose@Dell.com \
--cc=Jordan_Hargrave@Dell.com \
--cc=Matt_Domsch@Dell.com \
--cc=Vijay_Nijhawan@Dell.com \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=kay.sievers@vrfy.org \
--cc=linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).