From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH] tunnels: Fix tunnels change rcu protection Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 14:21:00 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20101027.142100.226782695.davem@davemloft.net> References: <4CC848B9.1060406@parallels.com> <1288206172.2658.11.camel@edumazet-laptop> <1288206372.2658.13.camel@edumazet-laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: xemul@parallels.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: eric.dumazet@gmail.com Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:59078 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932342Ab0J0VUh convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Oct 2010 17:20:37 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1288206372.2658.13.camel@edumazet-laptop> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: =46rom: Eric Dumazet Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 21:06:12 +0200 > Le mercredi 27 octobre 2010 =E0 21:02 +0200, Eric Dumazet a =E9crit : >=20 >=20 >> Hmm, maybe we should allocate a "struct ip_tunnel_parm" instead of u= sing >> an embedded one (in struct ip_tunnel), and stick an rcu_head in it t= o >> delay its freeing... >>=20 >=20 > I forgot to Ack your patch, of course. >=20 > We can implement something better when net-next-2.6 re-opens. >=20 > Acked-by: Eric Dumazet Applied.