From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vasiliy Kulikov Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] net: packet: fix information leak to userland Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2010 17:39:11 +0300 Message-ID: <20101106143911.GA17428@albatros> References: <1288545028-16436-1-git-send-email-segooon@gmail.com> <4CCE84E2.9050801@bfs.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" , Jiri Pirko , Eric Dumazet , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: walter harms Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4CCE84E2.9050801@bfs.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 10:14 +0100, walter harms wrote: > > > Vasiliy Kulikov schrieb: > > packet_getname_spkt() doesn't initialize all members of sa_data field of > > sockaddr struct if strlen(dev->name) < 13. This structure is then copied > > to userland. It leads to leaking of contents of kernel stack memory. > > We have to fully fill sa_data with strncpy() instead of strlcpy(). > > > > The same with packet_getname(): it doesn't initialize sll_pkttype field of > > sockaddr_ll. Set it to zero. > > > > Signed-off-by: Vasiliy Kulikov > > --- > > net/packet/af_packet.c | 3 ++- > > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/net/packet/af_packet.c b/net/packet/af_packet.c > > index 3616f27..0856a13 100644 > > --- a/net/packet/af_packet.c > > +++ b/net/packet/af_packet.c > > @@ -1719,7 +1719,7 @@ static int packet_getname_spkt(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *uaddr, > > rcu_read_lock(); > > dev = dev_get_by_index_rcu(sock_net(sk), pkt_sk(sk)->ifindex); > > if (dev) > > - strlcpy(uaddr->sa_data, dev->name, 15); > > + strncpy(uaddr->sa_data, dev->name, 14); > > else > > memset(uaddr->sa_data, 0, 14); > > if i understand the code correcly the max size for dev->name is IFNAMSIZ. For dev->name - IFNAMSIZ, for uaddr->sa_data - 14. > You can simply that part: > > memset(uaddr->sa_data, 0, IFNAMSIZ); > dev = dev_get_by_index_rcu(sock_net(sk), pkt_sk(sk)->ifindex); > if (dev) > strlcpy(uaddr->sa_data, dev->name, IFNAMSIZ); This will overflow uaddr->sa_data. Also I don't see any difficulty to fill the array only once. > you should send that as separate patch. > re, > wh > > > > rcu_read_unlock(); > > @@ -1742,6 +1742,7 @@ static int packet_getname(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *uaddr, > > sll->sll_family = AF_PACKET; > > sll->sll_ifindex = po->ifindex; > > sll->sll_protocol = po->num; > > + sll->sll_pkttype = 0; > > rcu_read_lock(); > > dev = dev_get_by_index_rcu(sock_net(sk), po->ifindex); > > if (dev) { Thanks, -- Vasiliy