From: Vasiliy Kulikov <segooon@gmail.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, jon.maloy@ericsson.com,
allan.stephens@windriver.com,
tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] net: tipc: fix information leak to userland
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2010 23:33:18 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101109203317.GA24933@albatros> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101109.092630.260076036.davem@davemloft.net>
On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 09:26 -0800, David Miller wrote:
> From: Vasiliy Kulikov <segooon@gmail.com>
> Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2010 20:10:32 +0300
>
> > Structure sockaddr_tipc is copied to userland with padding bytes after
> > "id" field in union field "name" unitialized. It leads to leaking of
> > contents of kernel stack memory. We have to initialize them to zero.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Vasiliy Kulikov <segooon@gmail.com>
>
> Applied.
>
> Patches #1 and #2 were given feedback which I need you to integrate
> and submit new patches based upon, thanks.
About #2:
I still think that this:
if (dev)
strncpy(uaddr->sa_data, dev->name, 14);
else
memset(uaddr->sa_data, 0, 14);
is better than this:
memset(uaddr->sa_data, 0, 14);
dev = dev_get_by_index_rcu(sock_net(sk), pkt_sk(sk)->ifindex);
if (dev)
strlcpy(uaddr->sa_data, dev->name, 15);
Doesn't it? Explicitly filling with zero on the same "if" level is
slightly easier to read and understand.
--
Vasiliy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-09 20:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-31 17:10 [PATCH 3/3] net: tipc: fix information leak to userland Vasiliy Kulikov
2010-11-09 17:26 ` David Miller
2010-11-09 20:33 ` Vasiliy Kulikov [this message]
2010-11-10 11:58 ` walter harms
2010-11-10 15:54 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101109203317.GA24933@albatros \
--to=segooon@gmail.com \
--cc=allan.stephens@windriver.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jon.maloy@ericsson.com \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).