From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Vasiliy Kulikov <segooon@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] net: tipc: fix information leak to userland
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2010 23:33:18 +0300
Message-ID: <20101109203317.GA24933@albatros>
References: <1288545032-16481-1-git-send-email-segooon@gmail.com>
 <20101109.092630.260076036.davem@davemloft.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, jon.maloy@ericsson.com,
	allan.stephens@windriver.com,
	tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20101109.092630.260076036.davem@davemloft.net>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 09:26 -0800, David Miller wrote:
> From: Vasiliy Kulikov <segooon@gmail.com>
> Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2010 20:10:32 +0300
> 
> > Structure sockaddr_tipc is copied to userland with padding bytes after
> > "id" field in union field "name" unitialized.  It leads to leaking of
> > contents of kernel stack memory.  We have to initialize them to zero.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Vasiliy Kulikov <segooon@gmail.com>
> 
> Applied.
> 
> Patches #1 and #2 were given feedback which I need you to integrate
> and submit new patches based upon, thanks.

About #2:

I still think that this:

    if (dev)
        strncpy(uaddr->sa_data, dev->name, 14);
    else
        memset(uaddr->sa_data, 0, 14);

is better than this:

    memset(uaddr->sa_data, 0, 14);
    dev = dev_get_by_index_rcu(sock_net(sk), pkt_sk(sk)->ifindex);
    if (dev)
        strlcpy(uaddr->sa_data, dev->name, 15);

Doesn't it?  Explicitly filling with zero on the same "if" level is
slightly easier to read and understand.

-- 
Vasiliy