From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Prevent crashing when parsing bad X.25 facilities
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 12:50:34 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <20101112.125034.242138369.davem@davemloft.net>
References: <1289570877.3090.274.camel@Dan>
	<20101112.122946.102556009.davem@davemloft.net>
	<1289594665.3090.336.camel@Dan>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: andrew.hendry@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org
To: drosenberg@vsecurity.com
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:56387
	"EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK)
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932344Ab0KLUuK (ORCPT
	<rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>); Fri, 12 Nov 2010 15:50:10 -0500
In-Reply-To: <1289594665.3090.336.camel@Dan>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>

From: Dan Rosenberg <drosenberg@vsecurity.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 15:44:25 -0500

> 
>> I find this kind of carelessness extremely amusing coming from someone
>> who is so big on security theatre.
> 
> You know what I find amusing?  The sheer number of security issues a
> single person can find in his spare time.  Congratulations on your
> attention to detail.

I do not even agree that, for example, pointer exposure is a real
issue.  It still remains a matter of opinion.

And much of your claims and boasting is based upon that opinion.

So don't pass it off saliently or indirectly as fact.