From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?utf-8?Q?Am=C3=A9rico?= Wang Subject: Re: Kernel rwlock design, Multicore and IGMP Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 17:33:45 +0800 Message-ID: <20101112093345.GC5949@cr0.nay.redhat.com> References: <1289489007.17691.1310.camel@edumazet-laptop> <20101112071323.GB5660@cr0.nay.redhat.com> <1289546874.17691.1774.camel@edumazet-laptop> <20101112081945.GA5949@cr0.nay.redhat.com> <1289553759.3185.1.camel@edumazet-laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: =?utf-8?Q?Am=C3=A9rico?= Wang , Cypher Wu , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev To: Eric Dumazet Return-path: Received: from mail-vw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.212.46]:46136 "EHLO mail-vw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752444Ab0KLJ3B (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Nov 2010 04:29:01 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1289553759.3185.1.camel@edumazet-laptop> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 10:22:39AM +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote: >Le vendredi 12 novembre 2010 =C3=A0 16:19 +0800, Am=C3=A9rico Wang a =C3= =A9crit : >> On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 08:27:54AM +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote: > >> >A RCU conversion is far more complex. >> > >>=20 >> Yup. > > >Well, actually this is easy in this case. > >I'll post a patch to do this RCU conversion. > Cool! Please keep me in Cc. Some conversions from rwlock to RCU are indeed complex, don't know about this case. Anyway, patch please. :)