From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: [PATCH 4/5] bridge: fix RCU races with bridge port
Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2010 13:12:05 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101114211515.424372255@vyatta.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20101114211201.678755903@vyatta.com
[-- Attachment #1: br-port-rcu-race.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 6647 bytes --]
The macro br_port_exists() is not enough protection when only
RCU is being used. There is a tiny race where other CPU has cleared port
handler hook, but is bridge port flag might still be set.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>
---
net/bridge/br_fdb.c | 15 +++++++++------
net/bridge/br_if.c | 5 +----
net/bridge/br_netfilter.c | 13 +++++++------
net/bridge/br_netlink.c | 10 ++++++----
net/bridge/br_notify.c | 2 +-
net/bridge/br_private.h | 16 +++++++++++++---
net/bridge/br_stp_bpdu.c | 8 ++++----
net/bridge/netfilter/ebtables.c | 11 +++++------
8 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
--- a/net/bridge/br_netfilter.c 2010-11-14 12:36:22.970441653 -0800
+++ b/net/bridge/br_netfilter.c 2010-11-14 12:44:55.666987357 -0800
@@ -131,17 +131,18 @@ void br_netfilter_rtable_init(struct net
static inline struct rtable *bridge_parent_rtable(const struct net_device *dev)
{
- if (!br_port_exists(dev))
- return NULL;
- return &br_port_get_rcu(dev)->br->fake_rtable;
+ struct net_bridge_port *port;
+
+ port = br_port_get_rcu(dev);
+ return port ? &port->br->fake_rtable : NULL;
}
static inline struct net_device *bridge_parent(const struct net_device *dev)
{
- if (!br_port_exists(dev))
- return NULL;
+ struct net_bridge_port *port;
- return br_port_get_rcu(dev)->br->dev;
+ port = br_port_get_rcu(dev);
+ return port ? port->br->dev : NULL;
}
static inline struct nf_bridge_info *nf_bridge_alloc(struct sk_buff *skb)
--- a/net/bridge/br_stp_bpdu.c 2010-11-14 12:36:22.982443121 -0800
+++ b/net/bridge/br_stp_bpdu.c 2010-11-14 12:44:55.666987357 -0800
@@ -141,10 +141,6 @@ void br_stp_rcv(const struct stp_proto *
struct net_bridge *br;
const unsigned char *buf;
- if (!br_port_exists(dev))
- goto err;
- p = br_port_get_rcu(dev);
-
if (!pskb_may_pull(skb, 4))
goto err;
@@ -153,6 +149,10 @@ void br_stp_rcv(const struct stp_proto *
if (buf[0] != 0 || buf[1] != 0 || buf[2] != 0)
goto err;
+ p = br_port_get_rcu(dev);
+ if (!p)
+ goto err;
+
br = p->br;
spin_lock(&br->lock);
--- a/net/bridge/netfilter/ebtables.c 2010-11-14 12:36:22.998445081 -0800
+++ b/net/bridge/netfilter/ebtables.c 2010-11-14 12:45:49.393153060 -0800
@@ -128,6 +128,7 @@ ebt_basic_match(const struct ebt_entry *
const struct net_device *in, const struct net_device *out)
{
const struct ethhdr *h = eth_hdr(skb);
+ const struct net_bridge_port *p;
__be16 ethproto;
int verdict, i;
@@ -148,13 +149,11 @@ ebt_basic_match(const struct ebt_entry *
if (FWINV2(ebt_dev_check(e->out, out), EBT_IOUT))
return 1;
/* rcu_read_lock()ed by nf_hook_slow */
- if (in && br_port_exists(in) &&
- FWINV2(ebt_dev_check(e->logical_in, br_port_get_rcu(in)->br->dev),
- EBT_ILOGICALIN))
+ if (in && (p = br_port_get_rcu(in)) != NULL &&
+ FWINV2(ebt_dev_check(e->logical_in, p->br->dev), EBT_ILOGICALIN))
return 1;
- if (out && br_port_exists(out) &&
- FWINV2(ebt_dev_check(e->logical_out, br_port_get_rcu(out)->br->dev),
- EBT_ILOGICALOUT))
+ if (out && (p = br_port_get_rcu(out)) != NULL &&
+ FWINV2(ebt_dev_check(e->logical_out, p->br->dev), EBT_ILOGICALOUT))
return 1;
if (e->bitmask & EBT_SOURCEMAC) {
--- a/net/bridge/br_fdb.c 2010-11-14 12:36:23.022448019 -0800
+++ b/net/bridge/br_fdb.c 2010-11-14 12:44:55.670987817 -0800
@@ -238,15 +238,18 @@ struct net_bridge_fdb_entry *__br_fdb_ge
int br_fdb_test_addr(struct net_device *dev, unsigned char *addr)
{
struct net_bridge_fdb_entry *fdb;
+ struct net_bridge_port *port;
int ret;
- if (!br_port_exists(dev))
- return 0;
-
rcu_read_lock();
- fdb = __br_fdb_get(br_port_get_rcu(dev)->br, addr);
- ret = fdb && fdb->dst->dev != dev &&
- fdb->dst->state == BR_STATE_FORWARDING;
+ port = br_port_get_rcu(dev);
+ if (!port)
+ ret = 0;
+ else {
+ fdb = __br_fdb_get(port->br, addr);
+ ret = fdb && fdb->dst->dev != dev &&
+ fdb->dst->state == BR_STATE_FORWARDING;
+ }
rcu_read_unlock();
return ret;
--- a/net/bridge/br_notify.c 2010-11-14 12:36:23.034449489 -0800
+++ b/net/bridge/br_notify.c 2010-11-14 12:44:55.670987817 -0800
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ struct notifier_block br_device_notifier
static int br_device_event(struct notifier_block *unused, unsigned long event, void *ptr)
{
struct net_device *dev = ptr;
- struct net_bridge_port *p = br_port_get(dev);
+ struct net_bridge_port *p;
struct net_bridge *br;
int err;
--- a/net/bridge/br_private.h 2010-11-14 12:44:07.257410977 -0800
+++ b/net/bridge/br_private.h 2010-11-14 12:44:55.670987817 -0800
@@ -151,11 +151,21 @@ struct net_bridge_port
#endif
};
-#define br_port_get_rcu(dev) \
- ((struct net_bridge_port *) rcu_dereference(dev->rx_handler_data))
-#define br_port_get(dev) ((struct net_bridge_port *) dev->rx_handler_data)
#define br_port_exists(dev) (dev->priv_flags & IFF_BRIDGE_PORT)
+static inline struct net_bridge_port *br_port_get_rcu(const struct net_device *dev)
+{
+ return br_port_exists(dev) ?
+ rcu_dereference(dev->rx_handler_data) : NULL;
+}
+
+static inline struct net_bridge_port *br_port_get(struct net_device *dev)
+{
+ return br_port_exists(dev) ? dev->rx_handler_data : NULL;
+}
+
+#define br_port_get(dev) ((struct net_bridge_port *) dev->rx_handler_data)
+
struct br_cpu_netstats {
u64 rx_packets;
u64 rx_bytes;
--- a/net/bridge/br_if.c 2010-11-14 12:36:23.046450958 -0800
+++ b/net/bridge/br_if.c 2010-11-14 12:44:55.670987817 -0800
@@ -475,11 +475,8 @@ int br_del_if(struct net_bridge *br, str
{
struct net_bridge_port *p;
- if (!br_port_exists(dev))
- return -EINVAL;
-
p = br_port_get(dev);
- if (p->br != br)
+ if (!p || p->br != br)
return -EINVAL;
del_nbp(p);
--- a/net/bridge/br_netlink.c 2010-11-14 12:36:23.062452917 -0800
+++ b/net/bridge/br_netlink.c 2010-11-14 12:44:55.670987817 -0800
@@ -119,11 +119,13 @@ static int br_dump_ifinfo(struct sk_buff
idx = 0;
for_each_netdev(net, dev) {
+ struct net_bridge_port *port = br_port_get(dev);
+
/* not a bridge port */
- if (!br_port_exists(dev) || idx < cb->args[0])
+ if (!port || idx < cb->args[0])
goto skip;
- if (br_fill_ifinfo(skb, br_port_get(dev),
+ if (br_fill_ifinfo(skb, port,
NETLINK_CB(cb->skb).pid,
cb->nlh->nlmsg_seq, RTM_NEWLINK,
NLM_F_MULTI) < 0)
@@ -169,9 +171,9 @@ static int br_rtm_setlink(struct sk_buff
if (!dev)
return -ENODEV;
- if (!br_port_exists(dev))
- return -EINVAL;
p = br_port_get(dev);
+ if (!p)
+ return -EINVAL;
/* if kernel STP is running, don't allow changes */
if (p->br->stp_enabled == BR_KERNEL_STP)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-14 21:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-14 21:12 [PATCH 0/5] bridge: RCU annotation and cleanup Stephen Hemminger
2010-11-14 21:12 ` [PATCH 1/5] bridge: add RCU annotation to bridge multicast table Stephen Hemminger
2010-11-14 21:12 ` [PATCH 2/5] bridge: add proper RCU annotation to should_route_hook Stephen Hemminger
2010-11-14 21:12 ` [PATCH 3/5] netdev: add rcu annotations to receive handler hook Stephen Hemminger
2010-11-14 21:12 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2010-11-14 21:12 ` [PATCH 5/5] bridge: add RCU annotations to bridge port lookup Stephen Hemminger
2010-11-15 12:23 ` [PATCH 0/5] bridge: RCU annotation and cleanup Tetsuo Handa
2010-11-15 13:33 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-11-15 16:19 ` Stephen Hemminger
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-11-15 16:38 [PATCH 0/5] bridge RCU patches (rev2) Stephen Hemminger
2010-11-15 16:38 ` [PATCH 4/5] bridge: fix RCU races with bridge port Stephen Hemminger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101114211515.424372255@vyatta.com \
--to=shemminger@vyatta.com \
--cc=bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).