From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: patchwork deferred?
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 18:04:19 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <20101115.180419.112575212.davem@davemloft.net>
References: <1289869813.16461.173.camel@Joe-Laptop>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
To: joe@perches.com
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:33530
	"EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK)
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755007Ab0KPCDy (ORCPT
	<rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>); Mon, 15 Nov 2010 21:03:54 -0500
In-Reply-To: <1289869813.16461.173.camel@Joe-Laptop>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>

From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 17:10:13 -0800

> Now that net-next is open, should patches with patchwork
> status "deferred" be resubmitted? 

>>From you, no, you're already consuming the bulk of my queue
and I'd like you to slow down so I can spend time on the
more neuron intensive patches.

Thanks.