* [net-2.6 PATCH v2] net: zero kobject in rx_queue_release
@ 2010-11-17 5:42 John Fastabend
2010-11-17 5:51 ` Eric Dumazet
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: John Fastabend @ 2010-11-17 5:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: davem; +Cc: john.r.fastabend, eric.dumazet, therbert, netdev
netif_set_real_num_rx_queues() can decrement and increment
the number of rx queues. For example ixgbe does this as
features and offloads are toggled. Presumably this could
also happen across down/up on most devices if the available
resources changed (cpu offlined).
The kobject needs to be zero'd in this case so that the
state is not preserved across kobject_put()/kobject_init_and_add().
This resolves the following error report.
ixgbe 0000:03:00.0: eth2: NIC Link is Up 10 Gbps, Flow Control: RX/TX
kobject (ffff880324b83210): tried to init an initialized object, something is seriously wrong.
Pid: 1972, comm: lldpad Not tainted 2.6.37-rc18021qaz+ #169
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff8121c940>] kobject_init+0x3a/0x83
[<ffffffff8121cf77>] kobject_init_and_add+0x23/0x57
[<ffffffff8107b800>] ? mark_lock+0x21/0x267
[<ffffffff813c6d11>] net_rx_queue_update_kobjects+0x63/0xc6
[<ffffffff813b5e0e>] netif_set_real_num_rx_queues+0x5f/0x78
[<ffffffffa0261d49>] ixgbe_set_num_queues+0x1c6/0x1ca [ixgbe]
[<ffffffffa0262509>] ixgbe_init_interrupt_scheme+0x1e/0x79c [ixgbe]
[<ffffffffa0274596>] ixgbe_dcbnl_set_state+0x167/0x189 [ixgbe]
Signed-off-by: John Fastabend <john.r.fastabend@intel.com>
---
net/core/net-sysfs.c | 10 ++++++++--
1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/core/net-sysfs.c b/net/core/net-sysfs.c
index a5ff5a8..7f902ca 100644
--- a/net/core/net-sysfs.c
+++ b/net/core/net-sysfs.c
@@ -712,15 +712,21 @@ static void rx_queue_release(struct kobject *kobj)
map = rcu_dereference_raw(queue->rps_map);
- if (map)
+ if (map) {
+ RCU_INIT_POINTER(queue->rps_map, NULL);
call_rcu(&map->rcu, rps_map_release);
+ }
flow_table = rcu_dereference_raw(queue->rps_flow_table);
- if (flow_table)
+ if (flow_table) {
+ RCU_INIT_POINTER(queue->rps_flow_table, NULL);
call_rcu(&flow_table->rcu, rps_dev_flow_table_release);
+ }
if (atomic_dec_and_test(&first->count))
kfree(first);
+ else
+ memset(kobj, 0, sizeof(*kobj));
}
static struct kobj_type rx_queue_ktype = {
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [net-2.6 PATCH v2] net: zero kobject in rx_queue_release
2010-11-17 5:42 [net-2.6 PATCH v2] net: zero kobject in rx_queue_release John Fastabend
@ 2010-11-17 5:51 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-11-17 6:01 ` John Fastabend
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Eric Dumazet @ 2010-11-17 5:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: John Fastabend; +Cc: davem, therbert, netdev
Le mardi 16 novembre 2010 à 21:42 -0800, John Fastabend a écrit :
> netif_set_real_num_rx_queues() can decrement and increment
> the number of rx queues. For example ixgbe does this as
> features and offloads are toggled. Presumably this could
> also happen across down/up on most devices if the available
> resources changed (cpu offlined).
>
> The kobject needs to be zero'd in this case so that the
> state is not preserved across kobject_put()/kobject_init_and_add().
>
> This resolves the following error report.
>
> ixgbe 0000:03:00.0: eth2: NIC Link is Up 10 Gbps, Flow Control: RX/TX
> kobject (ffff880324b83210): tried to init an initialized object, something is seriously wrong.
> Pid: 1972, comm: lldpad Not tainted 2.6.37-rc18021qaz+ #169
> Call Trace:
> [<ffffffff8121c940>] kobject_init+0x3a/0x83
> [<ffffffff8121cf77>] kobject_init_and_add+0x23/0x57
> [<ffffffff8107b800>] ? mark_lock+0x21/0x267
> [<ffffffff813c6d11>] net_rx_queue_update_kobjects+0x63/0xc6
> [<ffffffff813b5e0e>] netif_set_real_num_rx_queues+0x5f/0x78
> [<ffffffffa0261d49>] ixgbe_set_num_queues+0x1c6/0x1ca [ixgbe]
> [<ffffffffa0262509>] ixgbe_init_interrupt_scheme+0x1e/0x79c [ixgbe]
> [<ffffffffa0274596>] ixgbe_dcbnl_set_state+0x167/0x189 [ixgbe]
>
> Signed-off-by: John Fastabend <john.r.fastabend@intel.com>
> ---
I am not sure why you resent it, anyway, I ack it
Acked-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Thanks
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [net-2.6 PATCH v2] net: zero kobject in rx_queue_release
2010-11-17 5:51 ` Eric Dumazet
@ 2010-11-17 6:01 ` John Fastabend
2010-11-18 17:42 ` David Miller
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: John Fastabend @ 2010-11-17 6:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric Dumazet
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, therbert@google.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org
On 11/16/2010 9:51 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Le mardi 16 novembre 2010 à 21:42 -0800, John Fastabend a écrit :
>> netif_set_real_num_rx_queues() can decrement and increment
>> the number of rx queues. For example ixgbe does this as
>> features and offloads are toggled. Presumably this could
>> also happen across down/up on most devices if the available
>> resources changed (cpu offlined).
>>
>> The kobject needs to be zero'd in this case so that the
>> state is not preserved across kobject_put()/kobject_init_and_add().
>>
>> This resolves the following error report.
>>
>> ixgbe 0000:03:00.0: eth2: NIC Link is Up 10 Gbps, Flow Control: RX/TX
>> kobject (ffff880324b83210): tried to init an initialized object, something is seriously wrong.
>> Pid: 1972, comm: lldpad Not tainted 2.6.37-rc18021qaz+ #169
>> Call Trace:
>> [<ffffffff8121c940>] kobject_init+0x3a/0x83
>> [<ffffffff8121cf77>] kobject_init_and_add+0x23/0x57
>> [<ffffffff8107b800>] ? mark_lock+0x21/0x267
>> [<ffffffff813c6d11>] net_rx_queue_update_kobjects+0x63/0xc6
>> [<ffffffff813b5e0e>] netif_set_real_num_rx_queues+0x5f/0x78
>> [<ffffffffa0261d49>] ixgbe_set_num_queues+0x1c6/0x1ca [ixgbe]
>> [<ffffffffa0262509>] ixgbe_init_interrupt_scheme+0x1e/0x79c [ixgbe]
>> [<ffffffffa0274596>] ixgbe_dcbnl_set_state+0x167/0x189 [ixgbe]
>>
>> Signed-off-by: John Fastabend <john.r.fastabend@intel.com>
>> ---
>
> I am not sure why you resent it, anyway, I ack it
>
> Acked-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
>
> Thanks
>
>
net-next has Tom's changes for queue allocation and freeing. So the net-2.6 patch and net-next-2.6 patches are slightly different. I wanted to get the RCU_INIT_POINTER update in both and thought it would be easiest for Dave if they applied cleanly on both tree's. Let me know if there is a better way to indicate that here I just used the prefix net and net-next.
Thanks,
John.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [net-2.6 PATCH v2] net: zero kobject in rx_queue_release
2010-11-17 6:01 ` John Fastabend
@ 2010-11-18 17:42 ` David Miller
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: David Miller @ 2010-11-18 17:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: john.r.fastabend; +Cc: eric.dumazet, therbert, netdev
From: John Fastabend <john.r.fastabend@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 22:01:02 -0800
> net-next has Tom's changes for queue allocation and freeing. So the
> net-2.6 patch and net-next-2.6 patches are slightly different. I
> wanted to get the RCU_INIT_POINTER update in both and thought it
> would be easiest for Dave if they applied cleanly on both
> tree's. Let me know if there is a better way to indicate that here I
> just used the prefix net and net-next.
Right, applied, thanks everyone.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-11-18 17:41 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-11-17 5:42 [net-2.6 PATCH v2] net: zero kobject in rx_queue_release John Fastabend
2010-11-17 5:51 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-11-17 6:01 ` John Fastabend
2010-11-18 17:42 ` David Miller
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).