* addrconf: refcnt with IPV6_PRIVACY enabled
@ 2010-11-23 13:40 Sergey Senozhatsky
2010-11-23 14:33 ` Eric Dumazet
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Sergey Senozhatsky @ 2010-11-23 13:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David S. Miller
Cc: netdev, linux-kernel, Pekka Savola (ipv6), Hideaki YOSHIFUJI
Hello,
I've sent a patch http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/11/21/124
"[PATCH] ipv6: fix inet6_dev refcnt with IPV6_PRIVACY enabled" related
to wrong in6_dev refcnt value when IPV6_PRIVACY enabled.
I've took a second look, and question arised -
Is it actually necessary to in6_dev_hold/in6_dev_put in ipv6_regen_rndid?
In ipv6_regen_rndid we call in6_dev_hold only when mod_timer == 0,
and always in6_dev_put.
I've removed check for < 0 and goto from __ipv6_regen_rndid call, since it
always return 0.
Please, kindly review V2.
---
net/ipv6/addrconf.c | 10 +++-------
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
index 2fc35b3..8187d14 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
@@ -425,7 +425,6 @@ static struct inet6_dev * ipv6_add_dev(struct net_device *dev)
dev->name);
ndev->cnf.use_tempaddr = -1;
} else {
- in6_dev_hold(ndev);
ipv6_regen_rndid((unsigned long) ndev);
}
#endif
@@ -1653,8 +1652,7 @@ static void ipv6_regen_rndid(unsigned long data)
if (idev->dead)
goto out;
- if (__ipv6_regen_rndid(idev) < 0)
- goto out;
+ __ipv6_regen_rndid(idev);
expires = jiffies +
idev->cnf.temp_prefered_lft * HZ -
@@ -1667,13 +1665,11 @@ static void ipv6_regen_rndid(unsigned long data)
goto out;
}
- if (!mod_timer(&idev->regen_timer, expires))
- in6_dev_hold(idev);
-
+ mod_timer(&idev->regen_timer, expires);
+
out:
write_unlock_bh(&idev->lock);
rcu_read_unlock_bh();
- in6_dev_put(idev);
}
static int __ipv6_try_regen_rndid(struct inet6_dev *idev, struct in6_addr *tmpaddr) {
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: addrconf: refcnt with IPV6_PRIVACY enabled
2010-11-23 13:40 addrconf: refcnt with IPV6_PRIVACY enabled Sergey Senozhatsky
@ 2010-11-23 14:33 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-11-23 14:53 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2010-11-23 15:17 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Eric Dumazet @ 2010-11-23 14:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sergey Senozhatsky
Cc: David S. Miller, netdev, linux-kernel, Pekka Savola (ipv6),
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI
Le mardi 23 novembre 2010 à 15:40 +0200, Sergey Senozhatsky a écrit :
> Hello,
>
> I've sent a patch http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/11/21/124
> "[PATCH] ipv6: fix inet6_dev refcnt with IPV6_PRIVACY enabled" related
> to wrong in6_dev refcnt value when IPV6_PRIVACY enabled.
>
> I've took a second look, and question arised -
> Is it actually necessary to in6_dev_hold/in6_dev_put in ipv6_regen_rndid?
> In ipv6_regen_rndid we call in6_dev_hold only when mod_timer == 0,
> and always in6_dev_put.
>
>
> I've removed check for < 0 and goto from __ipv6_regen_rndid call, since it
> always return 0.
>
>
> Please, kindly review V2.
>
> ---
>
> net/ipv6/addrconf.c | 10 +++-------
> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
> index 2fc35b3..8187d14 100644
> --- a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
> +++ b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
> @@ -425,7 +425,6 @@ static struct inet6_dev * ipv6_add_dev(struct net_device *dev)
> dev->name);
> ndev->cnf.use_tempaddr = -1;
> } else {
> - in6_dev_hold(ndev);
> ipv6_regen_rndid((unsigned long) ndev);
> }
> #endif
> @@ -1653,8 +1652,7 @@ static void ipv6_regen_rndid(unsigned long data)
> if (idev->dead)
> goto out;
>
> - if (__ipv6_regen_rndid(idev) < 0)
> - goto out;
> + __ipv6_regen_rndid(idev);
>
> expires = jiffies +
> idev->cnf.temp_prefered_lft * HZ -
> @@ -1667,13 +1665,11 @@ static void ipv6_regen_rndid(unsigned long data)
> goto out;
> }
>
> - if (!mod_timer(&idev->regen_timer, expires))
> - in6_dev_hold(idev);
> -
> + mod_timer(&idev->regen_timer, expires);
> +
> out:
> write_unlock_bh(&idev->lock);
> rcu_read_unlock_bh();
> - in6_dev_put(idev);
> }
>
> static int __ipv6_try_regen_rndid(struct inet6_dev *idev, struct in6_addr *tmpaddr) {
>
Sergey, I dont think your patches (V1 or V2) are correct.
You leak a refcount if (idev->dead) is true
ipv6_regen_rndid() is the timer handler function, it must call
in6_dev_put() at the end, unless we rearm the timer.
So this code is correct.
if (!mod_timer(&idev->regen_timer, expires))
in6_dev_hold(idev);
...
in6_dev_put(idev);
And we must call in6_dev_hold() before calling the handler, either
directly from ipv6_add_dev() [Where your first patch tried to remove the
dev_hold() call], or when arming the timer.
Are you sure the problem you try to solve is not already solved in
commit 88b2a9a3d98a19496d64aadda7158c0ad51cbe7d in net-2.6 tree ?
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/davem/net-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=88b2a9a3d98a19496d64aadda7158c0ad51cbe7d
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: addrconf: refcnt with IPV6_PRIVACY enabled
2010-11-23 14:33 ` Eric Dumazet
@ 2010-11-23 14:53 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2010-11-23 15:08 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-11-23 15:17 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Sergey Senozhatsky @ 2010-11-23 14:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric Dumazet
Cc: David S. Miller, netdev, linux-kernel, Pekka Savola (ipv6),
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1073 bytes --]
Hello Eric,
On (11/23/10 15:33), Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Sergey, I dont think your patches (V1 or V2) are correct.
>
> You leak a refcount if (idev->dead) is true
>
Hm, that's true. Thank you.
> ipv6_regen_rndid() is the timer handler function, it must call
> in6_dev_put() at the end, unless we rearm the timer.
>
> So this code is correct.
>
>
> if (!mod_timer(&idev->regen_timer, expires))
> in6_dev_hold(idev);
> ...
> in6_dev_put(idev);
>
Even if in6_dev_hold hasn't been called from ipv6_regen_rndid?
>
> And we must call in6_dev_hold() before calling the handler, either
> directly from ipv6_add_dev() [Where your first patch tried to remove the
> dev_hold() call], or when arming the timer.
>
> Are you sure the problem you try to solve is not already solved in
> commit 88b2a9a3d98a19496d64aadda7158c0ad51cbe7d in net-2.6 tree ?
>
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/davem/net-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=88b2a9a3d98a19496d64aadda7158c0ad51cbe7d
>
Oh, haven't seen this one. I'll try, thank you.
Sergey
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 316 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: addrconf: refcnt with IPV6_PRIVACY enabled
2010-11-23 14:53 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
@ 2010-11-23 15:08 ` Eric Dumazet
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Eric Dumazet @ 2010-11-23 15:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sergey Senozhatsky
Cc: David S. Miller, netdev, linux-kernel, Pekka Savola (ipv6),
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI
Le mardi 23 novembre 2010 à 16:53 +0200, Sergey Senozhatsky a écrit :
>
> > ipv6_regen_rndid() is the timer handler function, it must call
> > in6_dev_put() at the end, unless we rearm the timer.
> >
> > So this code is correct.
> >
> >
> > if (!mod_timer(&idev->regen_timer, expires))
> > in6_dev_hold(idev);
> > ...
> > in6_dev_put(idev);
> >
>
> Even if in6_dev_hold hasn't been called from ipv6_regen_rndid?
>
Yes.
Rules are :
in6_dev_hold() when arming timer, so that device doesnt disappear while
timer handler might run and need it.
in6_dev_put() when timer handler finishes
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: addrconf: refcnt with IPV6_PRIVACY enabled
2010-11-23 14:33 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-11-23 14:53 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
@ 2010-11-23 15:17 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Sergey Senozhatsky @ 2010-11-23 15:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric Dumazet
Cc: David S. Miller, netdev, linux-kernel, Pekka Savola (ipv6),
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 440 bytes --]
On (11/23/10 15:33), Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Are you sure the problem you try to solve is not already solved in
> commit 88b2a9a3d98a19496d64aadda7158c0ad51cbe7d in net-2.6 tree ?
>
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/davem/net-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=88b2a9a3d98a19496d64aadda7158c0ad51cbe7d
>
Seems to work for me.
Sorry for noise, thank you.
Tested-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Sergey
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 316 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-11-23 15:17 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-11-23 13:40 addrconf: refcnt with IPV6_PRIVACY enabled Sergey Senozhatsky
2010-11-23 14:33 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-11-23 14:53 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2010-11-23 15:08 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-11-23 15:17 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).