From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH] econet: Move to staging; remove from defconfig Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2010 17:26:44 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <20101127.172644.226781076.davem@davemloft.net> References: <1290897868.3292.59.camel@localhost> <20101128002135.GA4562@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ben@decadent.org.uk, netdev@vger.kernel.org, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, debian-kernel@lists.debian.org To: gregkh@suse.de Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:40331 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750817Ab0K1B0T (ORCPT ); Sat, 27 Nov 2010 20:26:19 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20101128002135.GA4562@suse.de> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Greg KH Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2010 16:21:35 -0800 > And I need an ack from the networking maintainer to be able to accept > this also. I'm not applying this, nor do I want anyone else to. If people think this protocol is not maintained adequately right now, wait until you push it into staging. Furthermore, once Phil Blundell was made aware of security holes in econet he fixed them within a few days. Which is much better than I can say for some of the other protocols and filesystems in the tree. Moving this into staging, is therefore not appropriate.