From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] net: snmp: fix the wrong ICMP_MIB_MAX value Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 12:36:58 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <20101201.123658.242128686.davem@davemloft.net> References: <4CF34E03.8020504@cn.fujitsu.com> <20101201.123550.15237244.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org To: shanwei@cn.fujitsu.com Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:35146 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756862Ab0LAUgb (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Dec 2010 15:36:31 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20101201.123550.15237244.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: David Miller Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 12:35:50 -0800 (PST) > From: Shan Wei > Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 14:53:55 +0800 > >> @@ -60,8 +60,7 @@ struct ipstats_mib { >> }; >> >> /* ICMP */ >> -#define ICMP_MIB_MAX (__ICMP_MIB_MAX + 1) >> - >> +#define ICMP_MIB_MAX __ICMP_MIB_MAX >> struct icmp_mib { > > In all of my trees there is an "ICMP_MIB_DUMMY" define here, and it's > been there forever, I have no idea what you are patching against. Nevermind I see that this depends upon your first patch. Please resubmit all 3 patches once you've addressed the feedback for patch #1.