From: Shawn Bohrer <sbohrer@rgmadvisors.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: therbert@google.com
Subject: RFS configuration questions
Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2010 15:16:02 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101202211602.GA2775@BohrerMBP.rgmadvisors.com> (raw)
I've been playing around with RPS/RFS on my multiqueue 10g Chelsio NIC
and I've got some questions about configuring RFS.
I've enabled RPS with:
for x in $(seq 0 7); do
echo FFFFFFFF,FFFFFFFF > /sys/class/net/vlan816/queues/rx-${x}/rps_cpus
done
This appears to work when I watch 'mpstat -P ALL 1' as I can see the
softirq load is now getting distributed across all of the CPUs instead
of just the four (the card is a two port card and assigns four queues
per port) original hw receive queues which I have bound to CPUs
0-3.
To enable RFS I've run:
echo 16384 > /proc/sys/net/core/rps_sock_flow_entries
Is there any explanation of what this sysctl actually does? Is this
the max number of sockets/flows that the kernel can steer? Is this a
system wide max, a per interface max, or a per receive queue max?
Next I ran:
for x in $(seq 0 7); do
echo 16384 > /sys/class/net/vlan816/queues/rx-${x}/rps_flow_cnt
done
Is this correct? Is these the max number of sockets/flows that can be
steered per receive queue? Does the sum of these values need to add
up to rps_sock_flow_entries (I also tried 2048)? Is this all that is
needed to enable RFS?
With these settings I can watch 'mpstat -P ALL 1' and it doesn't
appear RFS has changed the softirq load. To get a better idea if it
was working I used taskset to bind my receiving processes to a set of
cores, yet mpstat still shows the softirq load getting distributed
across all cores, not just the ones where my receiving processes are
bound. Is there a better way to determine if RFS is actually working?
Have I configured RFS incorrectly?
Thanks,
Shawn
next reply other threads:[~2010-12-02 21:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-12-02 21:16 Shawn Bohrer [this message]
2010-12-02 21:40 ` RFS configuration questions Eric Dumazet
2010-12-03 16:00 ` Shawn Bohrer
2010-12-03 16:30 ` Ben Hutchings
2010-12-03 16:34 ` Eric Dumazet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101202211602.GA2775@BohrerMBP.rgmadvisors.com \
--to=sbohrer@rgmadvisors.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=therbert@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox