From: Simon Kirby <sim@hostway.ca>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: TSO/GRO/LRO/somethingO breaks LVS on 2.6.36
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2010 02:34:47 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101203103447.GA29714@hostway.ca> (raw)
Hello!
We upgraded some LVS (DR) servers from 2.6.35 to 2.6.36 on tg3 cards
(partno(BCM95721) rev 4201) with VLAN tags in use, to think that
everything looked great, but in fact...
LVS was receiving magically-merged TCP packets which it tried to forward
on to the real server, only to get annoyed at itself for trying to
forward a packet bigger than the device MTU:
IP A.47376 > B.529: . 175488:176936(1448) ack 1 win 92 <nop,nop,timestamp 52737308 29656081>
IP A.47376 > B.529: . 176936:179832(2896) ack 1 win 92 <nop,nop,timestamp 52737325 29656098>
IP B > A: ICMP B unreachable - need to frag (mtu 1500), length 556
This caused packet loss for any merged frames, which caused abysmal
performance for uploads via the LVS server. Local performance to or
from the box is still fine, because the stack doesn't care, only the
forwarding part of LVS is running into the problem.
Furthermore, disabling _everything_ reported by ethtool -k doesn't seem
to change the result, even if I down/up the interface after, and even if
I try on every single interface including the VLANned ones. This seems
to be another bug. Reverting to 2.6.35 makes it all work again.
Possibly related to commit 7fe876af921d1d2bc8353e0062c10ff35e902653
So how should this be fixed? Should LVS be taught to fragment, or must
we disable the merging in this case? It seems like it would work well if
the sending side could do the same offload in reverse, but I'm not sure
if that would be possible.
Simon-
next reply other threads:[~2010-12-03 10:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-12-03 10:34 Simon Kirby [this message]
2010-12-03 11:29 ` TSO/GRO/LRO/somethingO breaks LVS on 2.6.36 Eric Dumazet
2010-12-03 12:36 ` Simon Horman
2010-12-03 12:42 ` Simon Horman
2010-12-03 13:27 ` Ben Hutchings
2010-12-03 13:39 ` Simon Horman
2010-12-09 2:35 ` Simon Kirby
2010-12-09 2:51 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-12-22 23:39 ` Simon Kirby
2011-01-13 6:34 ` Simon Horman
2011-01-27 0:48 ` Simon Kirby
2011-01-27 1:36 ` Simon Horman
2011-01-27 7:42 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-01-27 14:42 ` Simon Horman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101203103447.GA29714@hostway.ca \
--to=sim@hostway.ca \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).