From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Hemminger Subject: Re: Misuse of LRO, how widespread Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 14:27:15 -0800 Message-ID: <20101206142715.0d296b25@nehalam> References: <20101206121829.5b8c852e@nehalam> <4CFD527E.7000706@chelsio.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: David Miller , Olof Johansson , Ben Hutchings , Divy Le Ray , netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Dimitris Michailidis Return-path: Received: from mail.vyatta.com ([76.74.103.46]:37833 "EHLO mail.vyatta.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753138Ab0LFW1S (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Dec 2010 17:27:18 -0500 In-Reply-To: <4CFD527E.7000706@chelsio.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, 06 Dec 2010 13:15:42 -0800 Dimitris Michailidis wrote: > Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > I inspected all drivers in net-next to see which drivers are using > > LRO and which ones are broken. Most concerning is that Chelsio > > and Solarflare drivers ignore ETH_FLAG_LRO. > > > > The ones that are using LRO but allow disabling it: > > qlcnic, netxen, mv643, s2io, myi10ge, bnx2x, ixgbe, vmxnet3 > > > > One driver seems confused about LRO vs GRO: > > mlx4 - comments about LRO and depends on LRO but driver is using GRO > > > > Drivers with not using ethtool interface to disable LRO: > > pasemi_mac, sfc, ehea, cxgb3, cxgb4 > > cxgb4 uses GRO, not LRO. Ok. but cxgb3 still uses LRO (or it least calls it lro). --