From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: (Lack of) specification for RX n-tuple filtering
Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 09:31:21 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <20101208.093121.260101453.davem@davemloft.net>
References: <1291825443.31064.193.camel@lb-tlvb-vladz>
	<20101208.083921.71108761.davem@davemloft.net>
	<1291829364.2560.24.camel@bwh-desktop>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: vladz@broadcom.com, dm@chelsio.com,
	peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@intel.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org
To: bhutchings@solarflare.com
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:56709
	"EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK)
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755130Ab0LHRax (ORCPT
	<rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>); Wed, 8 Dec 2010 12:30:53 -0500
In-Reply-To: <1291829364.2560.24.camel@bwh-desktop>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>

From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com>
Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 17:29:24 +0000

> I think the interfaces are actually somewhat more flexible than any of
> the current implementations.

Yeah you're probably right.