netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Florian Mickler <florian@mickler.org>
Cc: "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@elte.hu>,
	"Américo Wang" <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>,
	"Dave Chinner" <david@fromorbit.com>,
	"Eric Dumazet" <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [regression, 2.6.37-rc1] 'ip link tap0 up' stuck in do_exit()
Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 14:41:16 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101208134116.GA16923@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101208100245.01cf23c5@schatten.dmk.lab>

On 12/08, Florian Mickler wrote:
>
> [ ccing Ingo and Oleg ] as suggested

Well. Of course I can't explain this bug. But, looking at this email
I do not see amything strange in exit/schedule/etc.

> > >> > > > This is resulting in the command 'ip link set tap0 up' hanging as a zombie:
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > root      3005     1  0 16:53 pts/3    00:00:00 /bin/sh /vm-images/qemu-ifup tap0
> > >> > > > root      3011  3005  0 16:53 pts/3    00:00:00 /usr/bin/sudo /sbin/ip link set tap0 up
> > >> > > > root      3012  3011  0 16:53 pts/3    00:00:00 [ip] <defunct>

That is. ip is a zombie.

> > >> > > > In do_exit() with this trace:
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > [ 1630.782255] ip            x ffff88063fcb3600     0  3012   3011 0x00000000
> > >> > > > [ 1630.789121]  ffff880631328000 0000000000000046 0000000000000000 ffff880633104380
> > >> > > > [ 1630.796524]  0000000000013600 ffff88062f031fd8 0000000000013600 0000000000013600
> > >> > > > [ 1630.803925]  ffff8806313282d8 ffff8806313282e0 ffff880631328000 0000000000013600
> > >> > > > [ 1630.811324] Call Trace:
> > >> > > > [ 1630.813760]  [<ffffffff8104a90d>] ? do_exit+0x716/0x724
> > >> > > > [ 1630.818964]  [<ffffffff8104a995>] ? do_group_exit+0x7a/0xa4
> > >> > > > [ 1630.824512]  [<ffffffff8104a9d1>] ? sys_exit_group+0x12/0x16
> > >> > > > [ 1630.830149]  [<ffffffff81009a82>] ? system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > The address comes down to the schedule() call:
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > (gdb) l *(do_exit+0x716)
> > >> > > > 0xffffffff8104a90d is in do_exit (kernel/exit.c:1034).
> > >> > > > 1029            preempt_disable();
> > >> > > > 1030            exit_rcu();
> > >> > > > 1031            /* causes final put_task_struct in finish_task_switch(). */
> > >> > > > 1032            tsk->state = TASK_DEAD;
> > >> > > > 1033            schedule();
> > >> > > > 1034            BUG();
> > >> > > > 1035            /* Avoid "noreturn function does return".  */
> > >> > > > 1036            for (;;)
> > >> > > > 1037                    cpu_relax();    /* For when BUG is null */
> > >> > > > 1038    }

Everything is correct. The task is dead, but it wasn't released by its
parent, task_struct (and thus the stack) is still visible.

> > Interesting, the scheduler failed to put the dead task out of
> > run queue, so to me this is likely to be a scheduler bug.
> > I have no idea how sudo can change the behaviour here.
> >
> > Another guess is we need a smp_wmb() before schedule() above.

No, everything looks fine.

For example,

	$ perl -le 'print fork || exit; <>'
	17436

	$ ps 17436
	  PID TTY      STAT   TIME COMMAND
	17436 pts/22   Z+     0:00 [perl] <defunct>

	$ cat /proc/17436/stack
	[<ffffffff8104d3a0>] do_exit+0x6c4/0x6d2
	[<ffffffff8104d429>] do_group_exit+0x7b/0xa4
	[<ffffffff8104d469>] sys_exit_group+0x17/0x1b
	[<ffffffff8100bdb2>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
	[<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff

Oleg.

  reply	other threads:[~2010-12-08 13:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-11-03  6:26 [regression, 2.6.37-rc1] 'ip link tap0 up' stuck in do_exit() Dave Chinner
2010-11-03  7:13 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-11-03 10:34   ` Dave Chinner
2010-11-03 11:29     ` Dave Chinner
2010-11-04  0:21       ` Dave Chinner
2010-11-04  5:47         ` Américo Wang
2010-12-08  9:02           ` Florian Mickler
2010-12-08 13:41             ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2010-12-08 13:47               ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-12-08 14:08                 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-12-09 16:47                   ` Américo Wang
2010-12-09 17:07                     ` Eric Dumazet
2010-12-09 17:09                       ` Eric Dumazet
2010-12-09 17:59                     ` Jim Bos

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20101208134116.GA16923@redhat.com \
    --to=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=florian@mickler.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).