From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Florian Mickler <florian@mickler.org>
Cc: "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@elte.hu>,
"Américo Wang" <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>,
"Dave Chinner" <david@fromorbit.com>,
"Eric Dumazet" <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [regression, 2.6.37-rc1] 'ip link tap0 up' stuck in do_exit()
Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 14:41:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101208134116.GA16923@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101208100245.01cf23c5@schatten.dmk.lab>
On 12/08, Florian Mickler wrote:
>
> [ ccing Ingo and Oleg ] as suggested
Well. Of course I can't explain this bug. But, looking at this email
I do not see amything strange in exit/schedule/etc.
> > >> > > > This is resulting in the command 'ip link set tap0 up' hanging as a zombie:
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > root 3005 1 0 16:53 pts/3 00:00:00 /bin/sh /vm-images/qemu-ifup tap0
> > >> > > > root 3011 3005 0 16:53 pts/3 00:00:00 /usr/bin/sudo /sbin/ip link set tap0 up
> > >> > > > root 3012 3011 0 16:53 pts/3 00:00:00 [ip] <defunct>
That is. ip is a zombie.
> > >> > > > In do_exit() with this trace:
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > [ 1630.782255] ip x ffff88063fcb3600 0 3012 3011 0x00000000
> > >> > > > [ 1630.789121] ffff880631328000 0000000000000046 0000000000000000 ffff880633104380
> > >> > > > [ 1630.796524] 0000000000013600 ffff88062f031fd8 0000000000013600 0000000000013600
> > >> > > > [ 1630.803925] ffff8806313282d8 ffff8806313282e0 ffff880631328000 0000000000013600
> > >> > > > [ 1630.811324] Call Trace:
> > >> > > > [ 1630.813760] [<ffffffff8104a90d>] ? do_exit+0x716/0x724
> > >> > > > [ 1630.818964] [<ffffffff8104a995>] ? do_group_exit+0x7a/0xa4
> > >> > > > [ 1630.824512] [<ffffffff8104a9d1>] ? sys_exit_group+0x12/0x16
> > >> > > > [ 1630.830149] [<ffffffff81009a82>] ? system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > The address comes down to the schedule() call:
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > (gdb) l *(do_exit+0x716)
> > >> > > > 0xffffffff8104a90d is in do_exit (kernel/exit.c:1034).
> > >> > > > 1029 preempt_disable();
> > >> > > > 1030 exit_rcu();
> > >> > > > 1031 /* causes final put_task_struct in finish_task_switch(). */
> > >> > > > 1032 tsk->state = TASK_DEAD;
> > >> > > > 1033 schedule();
> > >> > > > 1034 BUG();
> > >> > > > 1035 /* Avoid "noreturn function does return". */
> > >> > > > 1036 for (;;)
> > >> > > > 1037 cpu_relax(); /* For when BUG is null */
> > >> > > > 1038 }
Everything is correct. The task is dead, but it wasn't released by its
parent, task_struct (and thus the stack) is still visible.
> > Interesting, the scheduler failed to put the dead task out of
> > run queue, so to me this is likely to be a scheduler bug.
> > I have no idea how sudo can change the behaviour here.
> >
> > Another guess is we need a smp_wmb() before schedule() above.
No, everything looks fine.
For example,
$ perl -le 'print fork || exit; <>'
17436
$ ps 17436
PID TTY STAT TIME COMMAND
17436 pts/22 Z+ 0:00 [perl] <defunct>
$ cat /proc/17436/stack
[<ffffffff8104d3a0>] do_exit+0x6c4/0x6d2
[<ffffffff8104d429>] do_group_exit+0x7b/0xa4
[<ffffffff8104d469>] sys_exit_group+0x17/0x1b
[<ffffffff8100bdb2>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
[<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff
Oleg.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-08 13:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-03 6:26 [regression, 2.6.37-rc1] 'ip link tap0 up' stuck in do_exit() Dave Chinner
2010-11-03 7:13 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-11-03 10:34 ` Dave Chinner
2010-11-03 11:29 ` Dave Chinner
2010-11-04 0:21 ` Dave Chinner
2010-11-04 5:47 ` Américo Wang
2010-12-08 9:02 ` Florian Mickler
2010-12-08 13:41 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2010-12-08 13:47 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-12-08 14:08 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-12-09 16:47 ` Américo Wang
2010-12-09 17:07 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-12-09 17:09 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-12-09 17:59 ` Jim Bos
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101208134116.GA16923@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=florian@mickler.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).