From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix 2.6.34-rc1 regression in disable_ipv6 support Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 12:20:52 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <20101209.122052.39177935.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20101209111611.1d2e6e2b@nehalam> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: shemminger@vyatta.com, brian.haley@hp.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, maheshkelkar@gmail.com, lorenzo@google.com, yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org, stable@kernel.org To: ebiederm@xmission.com Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:43004 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754145Ab0LIUUZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Dec 2010 15:20:25 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 11:31:36 -0800 > You fix the problem. You introduced the regression, and you didn't test > that keeping addresses actually worked. This is not the first patch > that has been applied to fix regressions in this area. Exactly, I fully agree with Eric.