From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] kthread: NUMA aware kthread_create_on_cpu()
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 16:44:38 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101209164438.fae1ba4c.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1291043695.3435.980.camel@edumazet-laptop>
On Mon, 29 Nov 2010 16:14:55 +0100
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> wrote:
> All kthreads being created from a single helper task, they all use
> memory from a single node for their kernel stack and task struct.
>
> This patch suite creates kthread_create_on_cpu(), adding a 'cpu'
> parameter to parameters already used by kthread_create().
>
> This parameter serves in allocating memory for the new kthread on its
> memory node if possible.
The name "kthread_create_on_cpu" is pretty misleading.
One would expect such a function to create a kthread which is bound to
that CPU. But what it in fact does is to create a kthread which is
bound to all CPUs and whose stack, task_struct and thread_info were
allocated from the node which contains `cpu'.
Also, a saner interface would be one which takes the numa_node_id, not
the cpu number.
>
> ...
>
> /**
> - * kthread_create - create a kthread.
> + * kthread_create_on_cpu - create a kthread.
> * @threadfn: the function to run until signal_pending(current).
> * @data: data ptr for @threadfn.
> + * @cpu: cpu number.
> * @namefmt: printf-style name for the thread.
> *
> * Description: This helper function creates and names a kernel
> * thread. The thread will be stopped: use wake_up_process() to start
> * it. See also kthread_run().
> *
> + * If thread is going to be bound on a particular cpu, give its number
> + * in @cpu, to get NUMA affinity for kthread stack, or else give -1.
This is a bit presumptuous. The caller might wish to later bind this
thread to some or all of the CPUs on the node, rather than to a single
CPU (eg, kswapd()).
So what to do? Maybe add a new kthread_create_node() which prepares a
kthread whose memory is bound to that node, then add a
kthread_create_cpu() convenience wrapper around that?
>
> ...
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-10 0:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-28 19:33 [PATCH] kthread: NUMA aware kthread_create_on_cpu() Eric Dumazet
2010-11-28 22:40 ` Andi Kleen
2010-11-28 22:51 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-11-28 23:01 ` Andi Kleen
2010-11-28 23:37 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-11-29 9:05 ` Andi Kleen
2010-11-29 9:38 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-11-29 15:13 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] " Eric Dumazet
2010-11-29 16:09 ` Andi Kleen
2010-11-29 17:39 ` David Miller
2010-11-29 17:59 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-11-29 23:31 ` Rusty Russell
2010-11-29 15:13 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] mm: NUMA aware alloc_task_struct_node() Eric Dumazet
2010-11-29 15:14 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] mm: NUMA aware alloc_thread_info_node() Eric Dumazet
2010-11-29 15:14 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] kthread: NUMA aware kthread_create_on_cpu() Eric Dumazet
2010-12-10 0:44 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2010-12-10 5:59 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-12-10 6:32 ` Andrew Morton
2010-12-10 7:02 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-12-10 7:09 ` Andrew Morton
2010-12-13 6:26 ` Thomas Fjellstrom
2010-11-29 15:15 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] kthread: use kthread_create_on_cpu() Eric Dumazet
2010-11-29 15:19 ` Tejun Heo
2010-11-30 9:38 ` David Howells
2010-11-30 9:59 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-11-29 9:03 ` [PATCH] kthread: NUMA aware kthread_create_on_cpu() Américo Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101209164438.fae1ba4c.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).