From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix hostap registration order Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 09:47:47 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <20101210.094747.193727608.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20101209.195315.193716225.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: j@w1.fi, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org To: mroos@linux.ee Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:36881 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754150Ab0LJRrU (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Dec 2010 12:47:20 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Meelis Roos Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 09:19:51 +0200 (EET) >> > In 2.6.37-rc4, hostap_pci init gives a WARNING with backtrace telling >> > that netif_stop_queue is called before register_netdev. Fix it by moving >> > this call after register_netdev. Removes the warning and seems to work, >> > but why is the call to netif_stop_queue needed at all after >> > register_netdev? >> >> It should simply not touch the queue state at all at this point. >> >> Your change would add a race. At the moment the device is registered >> it can be brought up, and then your code will eroneously modify >> the queue state. > > OK, I can make a simpler patch for that but I would like to understand > the original reasons for having netif_stop_queue there. Just a relict or > still somehow important? I think it was neither. The queue state is "don't care" at this point, and always has been, and a lot of drivers had this unnecessary netif_stop_queue() call there.