From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3 v2] ifb: use the lockless variants of skb_queue Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 14:35:27 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <20101210.143527.241438724.davem@davemloft.net> References: <1291510912-6979-1-git-send-email-xiaosuo@gmail.com> <1291559180.2159.683.camel@mojatatu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: xiaosuo@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, jarkao2@gmail.com To: hadi@cyberus.ca Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:34891 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752057Ab0LJWe7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Dec 2010 17:34:59 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1291559180.2159.683.camel@mojatatu> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: jamal Date: Sun, 05 Dec 2010 09:26:20 -0500 > On Sun, 2010-12-05 at 09:01 +0800, Changli Gao wrote: >> rq and tq are both protected by tx queue lock, so we can simply use >> the lockless variants of skb_queue. >> >> skb_queue_splice_tail_init() is used instead of the open coded and slow >> one. >> >> Signed-off-by: Changli Gao > > Signed-off-by: Jamal Hadi Salim I've applied the most up to date versions of all 3 of Changli's IFB patches, thanks!