From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: tj@kernel.org
Cc: mchan@broadcom.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6] bnx2: remove cancel_work_sync() from remove_one
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 12:20:00 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101221.122000.183069341.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101221105103.GA32744@htj.dyndns.org>
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 11:51:04 +0100
> Yeah, I agree the synchronize_rcu() there would guarantee the actual
> timer completion but as it currently stands it looks a bit too subtle.
> Maybe it's a good idea to add a big fat comment explaining that the
> the timer is guaranteed to stop after close() and how it's guaranteed
> through synchronize_rcu() at the moment? Also, it might be better to
> use synchronize_sched() there as timer synchronization through
> synchronize_rcu() is more of a happy accident.
I'm not sure the synchronize_*() is even necessary to guarentee
watchdog timer completion.
Like I said, I think the netif_tx_lock() held around both the timer
function itself, and the del_timer() call, are sufficient.
So, this ensures that the watchdog timer either runs to completion or
sees the no-op scheduler attached and returns immediately without
rescheduling the timer.
In any event, I'm going to apply your bnx2 patch to net-next-2.6
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-21 20:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-12-14 16:09 [PATCH net-next-2.6] bnx2: remove cancel_work_sync() from remove_one Tejun Heo
2010-12-14 17:48 ` Michael Chan
2010-12-15 13:52 ` Tejun Heo
2010-12-20 21:11 ` David Miller
2010-12-21 10:51 ` Tejun Heo
2010-12-21 20:20 ` David Miller [this message]
2010-12-22 8:48 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101221.122000.183069341.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchan@broadcom.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).