From: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
To: Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>
Cc: mcarlson@broadcom.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Michael Chan <mchan@broadcom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tg3: fix return value check in tg3_read_vpd()
Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2010 14:17:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201012291417.24424.dsterba@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101227201927.GA6365@bicker>
Hi,
On Monday 27 December 2010 21:19:27 Dan Carpenter wrote:
> Your fix is obviously correct, but could you describe the symptoms
> in your changelog instead of leaving it blank? In the original code,
> negative error values are ignored so we never goto out_not_found. Can
> pci_read_vpd() return any errors we care about besides -ENODEV? What I
> mean is, did you find this through analysing the code or did it cause a
> bug at runtime?
Although pci_read_vpd returns ENODEV directly, there is a call to vpd->read
function which may return other error values and is eg. set to
pci_vpd_pci22_read() :
drivers/pci/access.c::pci_vpd_pci22_read()
may return -EINVAL or -EINTR directly
or -ETIMEDOUT or -EINTR via pci_vpd_pci22_wait()
Yes, other negative values besides ETIMEDOUT and EINTR are ignored and after
3 attempts the pos != TG3_NVM_VPD_LEN check goes outwards. The fixed version
allows to jump out immediately. So this does not manifest itself as a
misbehaviour at runtime. It was found by code analysis.
I'll post updated patch.
dave
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-29 13:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-12-27 17:31 [PATCH] tg3: fix return value check in tg3_read_vpd() David Sterba
2010-12-27 20:19 ` Dan Carpenter
2010-12-29 13:17 ` David Sterba [this message]
2010-12-29 13:40 ` [PATCH v2] " David Sterba
2010-12-31 20:31 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201012291417.24424.dsterba@suse.cz \
--to=dsterba@suse.cz \
--cc=error27@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mcarlson@broadcom.com \
--cc=mchan@broadcom.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).