From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: virtualization@lists.osdl.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] vhost-net: check the support of mergeable buffer outside the receive loop
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 06:36:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110118043650.GA2233@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <19765.5737.352179.50100@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 12:26:17PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> Michael S. Tsirkin writes:
> > On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 04:10:59PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > No need to check the support of mergeable buffer inside the recevie
> > > loop as the whole handle_rx()_xx is in the read critical region. So
> > > this patch move it ahead of the receiving loop.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
> >
> > Well feature check is mostly just features & bit
> > so why would it be slower? Because of the rcu
> > adding memory barriers? Do you observe a
> > measureable speedup with this patch?
> >
>
> I do not measure the performance for just this patch, maybe not obvious. And it
> can also help the code unification.
>
> > Apropos, I noticed that the check in vhost_has_feature
> > is wrong: it uses the same kind of RCU as the
> > private pointer. So we'll have to fix that properly
> > by adding more lockdep classes, but for now
> > we'll need to make
> > the check 1 || lockdep_is_held(&dev->mutex);
> > and add a TODO.
> >
>
> Not sure, lockdep_is_head(&dev->mutex) maybe not accurate but sufficient, as it
> was always held in the read critical region.
Not really, when we call vhost_has_feature from the vq handling thread
it's not.
> > > ---
> > > drivers/vhost/net.c | 5 +++--
> > > 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/vhost/net.c b/drivers/vhost/net.c
> > > index 14fc189..95e49de 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/vhost/net.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/vhost/net.c
> > > @@ -411,7 +411,7 @@ static void handle_rx_mergeable(struct vhost_net *net)
> > > };
> > >
> > > size_t total_len = 0;
> > > - int err, headcount;
> > > + int err, headcount, mergeable;
> > > size_t vhost_hlen, sock_hlen;
> > > size_t vhost_len, sock_len;
> > > struct socket *sock = rcu_dereference(vq->private_data);
> > > @@ -425,6 +425,7 @@ static void handle_rx_mergeable(struct vhost_net *net)
> > >
> > > vq_log = unlikely(vhost_has_feature(&net->dev, VHOST_F_LOG_ALL)) ?
> > > vq->log : NULL;
> > > + mergeable = vhost_has_feature(&net->dev, VIRTIO_NET_F_MRG_RXBUF);
> > >
> > > while ((sock_len = peek_head_len(sock->sk))) {
> > > sock_len += sock_hlen;
> > > @@ -474,7 +475,7 @@ static void handle_rx_mergeable(struct vhost_net *net)
> > > break;
> > > }
> > > /* TODO: Should check and handle checksum. */
> > > - if (vhost_has_feature(&net->dev, VIRTIO_NET_F_MRG_RXBUF) &&
> > > + if (likely(mergeable) &&
> > > memcpy_toiovecend(vq->hdr, (unsigned char *)&headcount,
> > > offsetof(typeof(hdr), num_buffers),
> > > sizeof hdr.num_buffers)) {
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-18 4:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-17 8:10 [PATCH 1/3] vhost-net: check the support of mergeable buffer outside the receive loop Jason Wang
2011-01-17 8:11 ` [PATCH 2/3] vhost-net: Unify the code of mergeable and big buffer handling Jason Wang
2011-01-17 8:36 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-01-18 3:05 ` Jason Wang
2011-01-18 4:37 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-01-18 7:41 ` Jason Wang
2011-01-17 8:11 ` [PATCH 3/3] vhost-net: use lock_sock_fast() in peek_head_len() Jason Wang
2011-01-17 9:33 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-01-17 9:57 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-03-13 15:06 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-03-13 15:52 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-03-13 16:19 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-03-13 16:32 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-03-13 16:43 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-03-13 17:41 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-03-13 21:11 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-01-17 8:46 ` [PATCH 1/3] vhost-net: check the support of mergeable buffer outside the receive loop Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-01-18 4:26 ` Jason Wang
2011-01-18 4:36 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2011-01-18 9:15 ` Jason Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110118043650.GA2233@redhat.com \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=virtualization@lists.osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).