From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jarek Poplawski Subject: Re: inbound connection problems when "netlink: test for all flags of the NLM_F_DUMP composite" commit applied Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 17:18:31 +0100 Message-ID: <20110119161831.GA1845@del.dom.local> References: <4D336050.9030602@netfilter.org> <20110118093811.GA7520@ff.dom.local> <20110118.020702.115924992.davem@davemloft.net> <20110118102437.GB7520@ff.dom.local> <4D35F8A3.1010600@netfilter.org> <20110118211450.GC4288@del.dom.local> <4D36FADD.8000405@netfilter.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: David Miller , arthur.marsh@internode.on.net, jengelh@medozas.de, eric.dumazet@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, hadi@cyberus.ca To: Pablo Neira Ayuso Return-path: Received: from mail-fx0-f46.google.com ([209.85.161.46]:47050 "EHLO mail-fx0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754020Ab1ASQSi (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Jan 2011 11:18:38 -0500 Received: by fxm20 with SMTP id 20so1045702fxm.19 for ; Wed, 19 Jan 2011 08:18:37 -0800 (PST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4D36FADD.8000405@netfilter.org> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 03:53:17PM +0100, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: > On 18/01/11 22:14, Jarek Poplawski wrote: ... > > BTW, could you answer my earlier question, why NLM_F_ATOMIC flag isn't > > handled now with dumps? > > The NLM_F_ATOMIC flag is not affected, the netlink header is still > passed to netlink_dump_start() so you can check for it in the callback > to start an atomic dump. Right! I had some blackout, sorry. Jarek P.