From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: john.r.fastabend@intel.com
Cc: shmulikr@broadcom.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [net-2.6 PATCH 1/2] net: dcbnl: remove redundant DCB_CAP_DCBX_STATIC bit
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 15:19:22 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110124.151922.179947972.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D3DA050.3020006@intel.com>
From: John Fastabend <john.r.fastabend@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 07:52:48 -0800
> On 1/24/2011 7:27 AM, Shmulik Ravid wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, 2011-01-23 at 21:46 -0800, John Fastabend wrote:
>>> On 1/23/2011 8:53 AM, Shmulik Ravid wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, 2011-01-21 at 18:52 -0800, John Fastabend wrote:
>>>>> On 1/21/2011 6:35 PM, John Fastabend wrote:
>>>>>> Remove redundant DCB_CAP_DCBX_STATIC bit in DCB capabilities
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Setting this bit indicates that no embedded DCBx engine is
>>>>>> present and the hardware can not be configured. This is the
>>>>>> same as having none of the DCB capability flags set or simply
>>>>>> not implementing the dcbnl ops at all.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This patch removes this bit. The bit has not made a stable
>>>>>> release yet so removing it should not be an issue with
>>>>>> existing apps.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: John Fastabend <john.r.fastabend@intel.com>
>>>>>> CC: Shmulik Ravid <shmulikr@broadcom.com>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>
> Dave, Please drop this patch sorry for the noise.
OK.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-24 23:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-22 2:35 [net-2.6 PATCH 1/2] net: dcbnl: remove redundant DCB_CAP_DCBX_STATIC bit John Fastabend
2011-01-22 2:35 ` [net-2.6 PATCH 2/2] dcbnl: make get_app handling symmetric for IEEE and CEE DCBx John Fastabend
2011-01-24 23:20 ` David Miller
2011-01-22 2:52 ` [net-2.6 PATCH 1/2] net: dcbnl: remove redundant DCB_CAP_DCBX_STATIC bit John Fastabend
2011-01-23 16:53 ` Shmulik Ravid
2011-01-24 5:46 ` John Fastabend
2011-01-24 15:27 ` Shmulik Ravid
2011-01-24 15:52 ` John Fastabend
2011-01-24 23:19 ` David Miller [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110124.151922.179947972.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=john.r.fastabend@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shmulikr@broadcom.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).