From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for January 31 (ip_vs)
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 09:57:28 +1100
Message-ID: <20110131225727.GA23992@verge.net.au>
References: <20110131174113.8199f901.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
 <20110131101829.b842da44.randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
 <20110131211846.GH2389@verge.net.au>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
	netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, linux-next@vger.kernel.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
To: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20110131211846.GH2389@verge.net.au>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 08:18:47AM +1100, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 10:18:29AM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > On Mon, 31 Jan 2011 17:41:13 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > 
> > > Hi all,
> > > 
> > > Changes since 20110121:
> > > 
> > > The net tree lost its build failure.
> > 
> > 
> > When CONFIG_SYSCTL is not enabled:
> > 
> > net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c:1891: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 2 has type 'unsigned int'
> > ERROR: "unregister_net_sysctl_table" [net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs.ko] undefined!
> > ERROR: "register_net_sysctl_table" [net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs.ko] undefined!
> 
> Thanks, I'm looking into it.

On a related note, does IPVS need to handle the case
where CONFIG_PROC_FS is not enabled?