* Re: linux-next: Tree for January 31 (ip_vs) [not found] <20110131174113.8199f901.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> @ 2011-01-31 18:18 ` Randy Dunlap 2011-01-31 21:18 ` Simon Horman 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Randy Dunlap @ 2011-01-31 18:18 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Stephen Rothwell, netdev; +Cc: linux-next, LKML On Mon, 31 Jan 2011 17:41:13 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20110121: > > The net tree lost its build failure. When CONFIG_SYSCTL is not enabled: net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c:1891: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 2 has type 'unsigned int' ERROR: "unregister_net_sysctl_table" [net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs.ko] undefined! ERROR: "register_net_sysctl_table" [net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs.ko] undefined! --- ~Randy *** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code *** ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-next: Tree for January 31 (ip_vs) 2011-01-31 18:18 ` linux-next: Tree for January 31 (ip_vs) Randy Dunlap @ 2011-01-31 21:18 ` Simon Horman 2011-01-31 22:57 ` Simon Horman 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Simon Horman @ 2011-01-31 21:18 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Randy Dunlap; +Cc: Stephen Rothwell, netdev, linux-next, LKML On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 10:18:29AM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On Mon, 31 Jan 2011 17:41:13 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > Changes since 20110121: > > > > The net tree lost its build failure. > > > When CONFIG_SYSCTL is not enabled: > > net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c:1891: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 2 has type 'unsigned int' > ERROR: "unregister_net_sysctl_table" [net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs.ko] undefined! > ERROR: "register_net_sysctl_table" [net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs.ko] undefined! Thanks, I'm looking into it. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-next: Tree for January 31 (ip_vs) 2011-01-31 21:18 ` Simon Horman @ 2011-01-31 22:57 ` Simon Horman 2011-01-31 23:00 ` David Miller 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Simon Horman @ 2011-01-31 22:57 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Randy Dunlap; +Cc: Stephen Rothwell, netdev, linux-next, LKML On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 08:18:47AM +1100, Simon Horman wrote: > On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 10:18:29AM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > On Mon, 31 Jan 2011 17:41:13 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > Changes since 20110121: > > > > > > The net tree lost its build failure. > > > > > > When CONFIG_SYSCTL is not enabled: > > > > net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c:1891: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 2 has type 'unsigned int' > > ERROR: "unregister_net_sysctl_table" [net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs.ko] undefined! > > ERROR: "register_net_sysctl_table" [net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs.ko] undefined! > > Thanks, I'm looking into it. On a related note, does IPVS need to handle the case where CONFIG_PROC_FS is not enabled? ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-next: Tree for January 31 (ip_vs) 2011-01-31 22:57 ` Simon Horman @ 2011-01-31 23:00 ` David Miller 2011-02-01 0:03 ` Simon Horman 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: David Miller @ 2011-01-31 23:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: horms; +Cc: randy.dunlap, sfr, netdev, linux-next, linux-kernel From: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au> Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 09:57:28 +1100 > On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 08:18:47AM +1100, Simon Horman wrote: >> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 10:18:29AM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote: >> > On Mon, 31 Jan 2011 17:41:13 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: >> > >> > > Hi all, >> > > >> > > Changes since 20110121: >> > > >> > > The net tree lost its build failure. >> > >> > >> > When CONFIG_SYSCTL is not enabled: >> > >> > net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c:1891: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 2 has type 'unsigned int' >> > ERROR: "unregister_net_sysctl_table" [net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs.ko] undefined! >> > ERROR: "register_net_sysctl_table" [net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs.ko] undefined! >> >> Thanks, I'm looking into it. > > On a related note, does IPVS need to handle the case > where CONFIG_PROC_FS is not enabled? Yes. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-next: Tree for January 31 (ip_vs) 2011-01-31 23:00 ` David Miller @ 2011-02-01 0:03 ` Simon Horman 0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Simon Horman @ 2011-02-01 0:03 UTC (permalink / raw) To: David Miller; +Cc: randy.dunlap, sfr, netdev, linux-next, linux-kernel On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 03:00:31PM -0800, David Miller wrote: > From: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au> > Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 09:57:28 +1100 > > > On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 08:18:47AM +1100, Simon Horman wrote: > >> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 10:18:29AM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote: > >> > On Mon, 31 Jan 2011 17:41:13 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > >> > > >> > > Hi all, > >> > > > >> > > Changes since 20110121: > >> > > > >> > > The net tree lost its build failure. > >> > > >> > > >> > When CONFIG_SYSCTL is not enabled: > >> > > >> > net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c:1891: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 2 has type 'unsigned int' > >> > ERROR: "unregister_net_sysctl_table" [net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs.ko] undefined! > >> > ERROR: "register_net_sysctl_table" [net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs.ko] undefined! > >> > >> Thanks, I'm looking into it. > > > > On a related note, does IPVS need to handle the case > > where CONFIG_PROC_FS is not enabled? > > Yes. Thanks. I checked and it does seem to compile without CONFIG_PROC_FS and now also without CONFIG_SYSCTL, I'll send a patch for that right after I finish this email. I think that in both cases there is dead code, I'll clean that up next. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-02-01 0:03 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20110131174113.8199f901.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
2011-01-31 18:18 ` linux-next: Tree for January 31 (ip_vs) Randy Dunlap
2011-01-31 21:18 ` Simon Horman
2011-01-31 22:57 ` Simon Horman
2011-01-31 23:00 ` David Miller
2011-02-01 0:03 ` Simon Horman
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).