From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] bnx2x: MTU for FCoE L2 ring Date: Sun, 06 Feb 2011 11:21:08 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <20110206.112108.59675654.davem@davemloft.net> References: <1296996562.16759.9.camel@lb-tlvb-vladz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, eilong@broadcom.com To: vladz@broadcom.com Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:53075 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753594Ab1BFTUd (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 Feb 2011 14:20:33 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1296996562.16759.9.camel@lb-tlvb-vladz> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: "Vladislav Zolotarov" Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2011 14:49:22 +0200 > Always configure an FCoE L2 ring with a mini-jumbo MTU size (2500). > To do that we had to move the rx_buf_size parameter from per > function level to a per ring level. > > Signed-off-by: Vladislav Zolotarov > Signed-off-by: Eilon Greenstein Applied.