From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: "Matt Carlson" <mcarlson@broadcom.com>
Cc: "netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"David Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"Michael Chan" <mchan@broadcom.com>,
"Linux PM mailing list" <linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
"Thomas Fjellstrom" <thomas@fjellstrom.ca>,
"Jay Cliburn" <jcliburn@gmail.com>,
"Chris Snook" <chris.snook@gmail.com>,
"Jie Yang" <jie.yang@atheros.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] tg3: Avoid setting power.can_wakeup for devices that cannot wake up
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 22:08:42 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201102102208.42410.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110210204844.GA4158@mcarlson.broadcom.com>
On Thursday, February 10, 2011, Matt Carlson wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 08:53:09AM -0800, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
> >
> > The tg3 driver uses device_init_wakeup() in such a way that the
> > device's power.can_wakeup flag may be set even though the PCI
> > subsystem cleared it before, in which case the device cannot wake
> > up the system from sleep states. Modify the driver to only change
> > the power.can_wakeup flag if the device is not capable of generating
> > wakeup signals.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/tg3.c | 6 ++++--
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > Index: linux-2.6/drivers/net/tg3.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/net/tg3.c
> > +++ linux-2.6/drivers/net/tg3.c
> > @@ -12403,9 +12403,11 @@ static void __devinit tg3_get_eeprom_hw_
> > tp->tg3_flags3 |= TG3_FLG3_RGMII_EXT_IBND_TX_EN;
> > }
> > done:
> > - device_init_wakeup(&tp->pdev->dev, tp->tg3_flags & TG3_FLAG_WOL_CAP);
> > - device_set_wakeup_enable(&tp->pdev->dev,
> > + if (tp->tg3_flags & TG3_FLAG_WOL_CAP)
> > + device_set_wakeup_enable(&tp->pdev->dev,
> > tp->tg3_flags & TG3_FLAG_WOL_ENABLE);
> > + else
> > + device_set_wakeup_capable(&tp->pdev->dev, false);
>
> I did this because I couldn't see where 'can_wakeup' gets set. I don't
> see a call to device_init_wakeup() that would be relevant to tg3
> devices. I do see a couple calls to device_set_wakeup_capable() in
> acpi/glue.c and acpi/scan.c. Is that the place?
No, it's pci_pm_init() or platform_pci_wakeup_init() and they both use
device_set_wakeup_capable() rather tha device_init_wakeup(), which is just a
combination of device_set_wakeup_capable() and device_set_wakeup_enable()
anyway.
And there's no why reason PCI drivers should use device_pm_init() at all.
> > }
> >
> > static int __devinit tg3_issue_otp_command(struct tg3 *tp, u32 cmd)
>
> This is something I was always curious about too. The TG3_FLAG_WOL_CAP
> tracks whether or not the device can handle WOL. Is it safe to do away
> with this flag and lean on the 'can_wakeup' flag instead?
I don't think so. power.can_wakeup only tracks the capability to generate
wakeup signals from the PCI perspective and it is set by PCI if the device
appears to be able to generate wakeup signals.
So, I think the driver should work as in the $subject patch - reset the
power.can_wakeup flag if TG3_FLAG_WOL_CAP is unset and don't touch it
otherwise.
Thanks,
Rafael
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-10 21:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-10 16:51 [PATCH 0/3] Net driver fixes related to power management Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-02-10 16:53 ` [PATCH 1/3] tg3: Avoid setting power.can_wakeup for devices that cannot wake up Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-02-10 20:48 ` Matt Carlson
2011-02-10 21:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2011-02-11 0:00 ` Matt Carlson
2011-02-10 16:54 ` [PATCH 2/3] atl1c: Do not call device_init_wakeup() in atl1c_probe() Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-02-10 16:55 ` [PATCH 3/3] atl1: Do not use legacy PCI power management Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-02-11 19:39 ` [PATCH 0/3] Net driver fixes related to " David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201102102208.42410.rjw@sisk.pl \
--to=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=chris.snook@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jcliburn@gmail.com \
--cc=jie.yang@atheros.com \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=mcarlson@broadcom.com \
--cc=mchan@broadcom.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=thomas@fjellstrom.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).