From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kurt Van Dijck Subject: Re: [PATCH -next/mmotm] net/can: fix softing build errors Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 12:15:04 +0100 Message-ID: <20110212111344.GA328@e-circ.dyndns.org> References: <201102110100.p1B10sDx029244@imap1.linux-foundation.org> <20110211223312.be571303.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, netdev , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net To: Randy Dunlap Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110211223312.be571303.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 10:33:12PM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > warning: (CAN_SOFTING_CS) selects CAN_SOFTING which has unmet direct dependencies (NET && CAN && CAN_DEV && HAS_IOMEM) > > with this partial config: > > CONFIG_CAN=m > # CONFIG_CAN_RAW is not set > # CONFIG_CAN_BCM is not set > # CAN Device Drivers > # CONFIG_CAN_VCAN is not set > CONFIG_CAN_SLCAN=m > # CONFIG_CAN_DEV is not set > CONFIG_CAN_SOFTING=m > CONFIG_CAN_SOFTING_CS=m > # CONFIG_CAN_DEBUG_DEVICES is not set I understand the output, but I don't understand the cause well enough. CAN_SOFTING=m has a 'depends on CAN_DEV' Is it then possible to have CAN_SOFTING=m _and not_ CAN_DEV ? > regards, Kurt