From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH] arp_notify: unconditionally send gratuitous ARP for NETDEV_NOTIFY_PEERS. Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 10:51:14 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <20110215.105114.226760606.davem@davemloft.net> References: <1297446256-23917-1-git-send-email-ian.campbell@citrix.com> <20110214.174654.115944453.davem@davemloft.net> <1297761225.21980.3663.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Ian.Campbell@eu.citrix.com Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:46087 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932070Ab1BOSui (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Feb 2011 13:50:38 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1297761225.21980.3663.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Ian Campbell Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 09:13:45 +0000 > On Tue, 2011-02-15 at 01:46 +0000, David Miller wrote: >> From: Ian Campbell >> Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 17:44:16 +0000 >> >> > NETDEV_NOTIFY_PEER is an explicit request by the driver to send a link >> > notification while NETDEV_UP/NETDEV_CHANGEADDR generate link >> > notifications as a sort of side effect. ... > I nearly forgot -- the NETDEV_NOTIFY_PEER stuff was tagged for > stable/longterm backport (it appeared in 2.6.32.19 or so). I think this > change should likewise go back, what do you think? Sure, I've queued it up for -stable.