From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: pablo@netfilter.org
Subject: [PATCH] route_bench: Filter out all responses.
Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2011 14:04:50 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110220.140450.48516784.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
Install a socket filter to reduce the pure netlink overhead.
Unfortunately the libmnl library does not provide a way to
set socket options that are of level other than SOL_NETLINK.
So we hack it by knowing some things about libmnl internals.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
---
The knowledge of libmnl internals is unfortunate, but there
is currently no other way to do this.
route_bench.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
1 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/route_bench.c b/route_bench.c
index c75ea45..6c6b525 100644
--- a/route_bench.c
+++ b/route_bench.c
@@ -22,6 +22,17 @@
#include <linux/if.h>
#include <linux/if_link.h>
#include <linux/rtnetlink.h>
+#include <linux/filter.h>
+
+/* XXX Ugly knowledge of internals, but there is currently no way
+ * XXX provided by the libmnl library to set socket options that are
+ * XXX of level other than SOL_NETLINK. And we need to set one of
+ * XXX level SOL_SOCKET to install the socket filter.
+ */
+struct mnl_socket {
+ int fd;
+ struct sockaddr_nl addr;
+};
static int usage(void)
{
@@ -139,8 +150,10 @@ static int do_bench(int count, in_addr_t src_addr, in_addr_t dst_addr,
unsigned int mark, unsigned int iif)
{
char send_buf[MNL_SOCKET_BUFFER_SIZE];
- char recv_buf[MNL_SOCKET_BUFFER_SIZE];
unsigned int min, sec, frac, tmp;
+ struct sock_filter insns = { .code = BPF_RET | BPF_K,
+ .k = 0 };
+ struct sock_fprog filter = { .len = 1, .filter = &insns, };
struct bench_state *s = &state;
struct timeval start_time;
struct timeval end_time;
@@ -148,7 +161,7 @@ static int do_bench(int count, in_addr_t src_addr, in_addr_t dst_addr,
struct nlmsghdr *nlh;
unsigned int portid;
struct rtmsg *rtm;
- int i;
+ int i, err;
init_bench_state(s);
@@ -165,10 +178,15 @@ static int do_bench(int count, in_addr_t src_addr, in_addr_t dst_addr,
portid = mnl_socket_get_portid(nl);
+ err = setsockopt(nl->fd, SOL_SOCKET, SO_ATTACH_FILTER, &filter, sizeof(filter));
+ if (err) {
+ perror("setsockopt");
+ return -1;
+ }
+
gettimeofday(&start_time, NULL);
for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
unsigned int seq;
- int ret;
nlh = mnl_nlmsg_put_header(send_buf);
nlh->nlmsg_type = RTM_GETROUTE;
@@ -197,11 +215,10 @@ static int do_bench(int count, in_addr_t src_addr, in_addr_t dst_addr,
perror("mnl_socket_sendto");
return -1;
}
- ret = mnl_socket_recvfrom(nl, recv_buf, sizeof(recv_buf));
- if (ret < 0) {
- perror("mnl_sock_recvfrom");
- return -1;
- }
+
+ /* No need to do a receive, as the socket filter rejects
+ * all packets.
+ */
advance_bench_state(s);
}
--
1.7.4.1
next reply other threads:[~2011-02-20 22:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-20 22:04 David Miller [this message]
2011-02-20 22:28 ` [PATCH] route_bench: Filter out all responses Pablo Neira Ayuso
2011-02-20 22:32 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110220.140450.48516784.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox