From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/6] netem patches
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 22:14:55 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <20110224.221455.226769438.davem@davemloft.net>
References: <20110223230416.532009518@vyatta.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
To: shemminger@vyatta.com
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:57641
	"EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK)
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751938Ab1BYGOS (ORCPT
	<rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>); Fri, 25 Feb 2011 01:14:18 -0500
In-Reply-To: <20110223230416.532009518@vyatta.com>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>

From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 15:04:16 -0800

> These have been resting in a moldy place for far to long.
> The most important is the integration of a better packet
> loss model for netem

All applied, thanks Stephen.