netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shiraz Hashim <shiraz.hashim@st.com>
To: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Cc: Brian Downing <bdowning@lavos.net>,
	Deepak SIKRI <deepak.sikri@st.com>,
	Armando VISCONTI <armando.visconti@st.com>,
	Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>,
	"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux NFS Mailing List <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>,
	Viresh KUMAR <viresh.kumar@st.com>,
	Peppe CAVALLARO <peppe.cavallaro@st.com>,
	amitgoel <amit.goel@st.com>
Subject: Re: STMMAC driver: NFS Problem on 2.6.37
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 19:06:27 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110224133627.GO920@DLHLAP0379> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5CC01953-376D-46FC-99DA-C282332FA40F@oracle.com>

On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 05:26:16AM +0800, Chuck Lever wrote:
> 
> On Feb 9, 2011, at 3:58 PM, Brian Downing wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 03:12:22PM -0500, Chuck Lever wrote:
> >> Based on your console logs, I see that the working case uses UDP to
> >> contact the server's mountd, but the failing case uses TCP.  You can
> >> try explicitly specifying "proto=udp" to force the use of UDP, to test
> >> this theory.
> > 
> > This does indeed make it work again for me, thanks!
> > 
> >> Meanwhile, the patch description explicitly states that the default
> >> mount option settings have changed.  Does it make sense to change the
> >> default behavior of NFSROOT mounts to use UDP again?  I don't see
> >> another way to make this process more reliable across NIC
> >> initialization.  If this is considered a regression, we can make a
> >> patch for 2.6.38-rc and 2.6.37.
> > 
> > I only use nfsroot for development, so I don't have a terribly strong
> > opinion.  I would point out though that the default u-boot parameters
> > for nfsrooting a lot of boards will no longer work at this point, so if
> > it's not patched to work again without specifying nfs options I think
> > there should at least be a note in the documentation and possibly a
> > "maybe try proto=udp?" console message on failure.
> > 
> > I assume it's not feasable to either wait until the chosen interface's
> > link is ready before trying to mount nfsroot, or retrying TCP-based
> > connections a little bit more aggressively/at all?
> 
> Our goal is to use the same mount logic for both normal user
> space mounts and for NFSROOT (that was the purpose of the patch
> series this particular patch comes from).  It's
> exceptionally difficult to add a special case for retrying TCP
> connections here, as that would change the behavior of user
> space mounts, which often want to fail quickly, and don't need
> to worry about NIC initialization.
> 
> Sounds like the right thing to do is restore the default UDP behavior.  I'll cook up a patch.

Is there some patch available for this now.

There is one more observation (on 2.6.37), when I pass
nfsroot=$(ip):$(rootpath),udp , then it works fine.
If I pass proto=udp then it doesn't work. Is there any difference
between the two methods ?

-- 
regards
Shiraz

  reply	other threads:[~2011-02-24 14:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-01-13  9:09 STMMAC driver: NFS Problem on 2.6.37 deepaksi
     [not found] ` <4D2EC133.7010607-qxv4g6HH51o@public.gmane.org>
2011-01-13 11:48   ` Peppe CAVALLARO
2011-01-13 15:07   ` Chuck Lever
     [not found]     ` <2D04CF75-CA68-4BDC-99A3-FA1DD6113602-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2011-01-13 18:28       ` Armando Visconti
2011-01-14  9:56         ` deepaksi
     [not found]           ` <4D301DD1.9070104-qxv4g6HH51o@public.gmane.org>
2011-01-14 15:35             ` Chuck Lever
     [not found]               ` <4D3EBA54.4020308@st.com>
     [not found]                 ` <4D3EBA54.4020308-qxv4g6HH51o@public.gmane.org>
2011-01-25 18:04                   ` Chuck Lever
     [not found]                     ` <EFFBD485-8B7E-44D1-A8D2-61E73BF42DF9-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2011-01-28 12:43                       ` Shiraz Hashim
2011-01-28 16:58                         ` Chuck Lever
2011-02-09 20:01                     ` Brian Downing
     [not found]                       ` <20110209200129.GA6402-QEOkiq82tQWoLK6CJbI5/KxOck334EZe@public.gmane.org>
2011-02-09 20:12                         ` Chuck Lever
2011-02-09 20:58                           ` Brian Downing
     [not found]                             ` <20110209205855.GB6402-QEOkiq82tQWoLK6CJbI5/KxOck334EZe@public.gmane.org>
2011-02-09 21:26                               ` Chuck Lever
2011-02-24 13:36                                 ` Shiraz Hashim [this message]
2011-02-24 18:33                                   ` Chuck Lever

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110224133627.GO920@DLHLAP0379 \
    --to=shiraz.hashim@st.com \
    --cc=Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com \
    --cc=amit.goel@st.com \
    --cc=armando.visconti@st.com \
    --cc=bdowning@lavos.net \
    --cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
    --cc=deepak.sikri@st.com \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peppe.cavallaro@st.com \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@st.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).