From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [patch 0/1] [resend] s390: one more qeth patches for net-next
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 14:04:54 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <20110225.140454.116375279.davem@davemloft.net>
References: <20110225123208.764828326@de.ibm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
To: frank.blaschka@de.ibm.com
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:60730
	"EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK)
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755481Ab1BYWER (ORCPT
	<rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>); Fri, 25 Feb 2011 17:04:17 -0500
In-Reply-To: <20110225123208.764828326@de.ibm.com>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>

From: frank.blaschka@de.ibm.com
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 13:32:08 +0100

> I did not find this patch in net-next so far

It's in my backlog, a simply query to active patches in patchwork
would have shown you this.

	http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/

Please do not resubmit patches which are properly queued up in
patchwork, as this makes more work for me.