From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Graf Subject: Re: SO_REUSEPORT - can it be done in kernel? Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 10:01:50 -0500 Message-ID: <20110228150150.GG9763@canuck.infradead.org> References: <20110225.112019.48513284.davem@davemloft.net> <20110226005718.GA19889@gondor.apana.org.au> <20110227110205.GE9763@canuck.infradead.org> <20110227110614.GA6246@gondor.apana.org.au> <20110228113659.GA20726@gondor.apana.org.au> <1298899971.2941.281.camel@edumazet-laptop> <1298904783.2941.412.camel@edumazet-laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Herbert Xu , David Miller , rick.jones2@hp.com, therbert@google.com, wsommerfeld@google.com, daniel.baluta@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Eric Dumazet Return-path: Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([18.85.46.34]:52147 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754484Ab1B1PB4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Feb 2011 10:01:56 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1298904783.2941.412.camel@edumazet-laptop> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 03:53:03PM +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote: > What do you suggest to perform a bind based test ? We use queryperf from BIND sources. I typically run 1 queryperf instance per core on multiple machines.