From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jiri Pirko Subject: Re: [patch net-next-2.6 4/4] bridge: implement slave management operations Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2011 07:19:14 +0100 Message-ID: <20110301061913.GA2855@psychotron.redhat.com> References: <20110211152125.GA2763@psychotron.brq.redhat.com> <20110211152346.GD2763@psychotron.brq.redhat.com> <20110228141729.09c3b770@nehalam> <20110228144516.0174a9c8@nehalam> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Stephen Hemminger , netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, kaber@trash.net, fubar@us.ibm.com To: Stephen Hemminger Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:37612 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752148Ab1CAGTX (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Mar 2011 01:19:23 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110228144516.0174a9c8@nehalam> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 11:45:16PM CET, shemminger@vyatta.com wrote: >On Mon, 28 Feb 2011 14:17:29 -0800 >Stephen Hemminger wrote: > >> On Fri, 11 Feb 2011 16:23:47 +0100 >> Jiri Pirko wrote: >> >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko >> > >Never mind, this is good. I was confusing slave with bridge initialization >and netdevice ops with ethtool ops. > >Ethtool ops seems to be growing like weeds lately... This was replaced by: bridge: implement [add/del]_slave ops never intended to be in ethtool > > > >--