From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input)
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BUG] VPN broken in net-next
Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2011 17:03:46 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110302.170346.13723622.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110302165653.4b854489@nehalam>
From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2011 16:56:53 -0800
> On Wed, 02 Mar 2011 16:50:09 -0800 (PST)
> David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:
>
>> From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>
>> Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2011 16:46:37 -0800
>>
>> > The addresses (that matter) when VPN is up are:
>>
>> I really need to know what addresses interfaces have the time of the
>> __ip_dev_find() call which, if I'm not mistaken, is before the VPN is
>> up.
>
>
> inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo
> inet 192.168.1.11/24 brd 192.168.1.255 scope global eth0
> inet 192.168.100.1/24 brd 192.168.100.255 scope global virbr0
> inet 192.168.99.1/24 brd 192.168.99.255 scope global virbr1
I see nothing providing 10.0.whatever that __ip_dev_find() is being
asked to resolve.
I think we were allowing the route lookup pptp is trying to do at
connect time erroneously, and it should elide the explicit source
address specification in the flow.
See my other email.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-03 1:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-03 0:28 [BUG] VPN broken in net-next Stephen Hemminger
2011-03-03 0:41 ` Stephen Hemminger
2011-03-03 0:43 ` David Miller
2011-03-03 0:46 ` Stephen Hemminger
2011-03-03 0:50 ` David Miller
2011-03-03 0:54 ` David Miller
2011-03-03 12:41 ` Julian Anastasov
2011-03-03 13:09 ` Julian Anastasov
2011-03-03 17:32 ` Stephen Hemminger
2011-03-03 19:23 ` David Miller
2011-03-03 21:54 ` Stephen Hemminger
2011-03-04 8:39 ` Julian Anastasov
2011-03-23 4:56 ` David Miller
2011-03-23 9:05 ` Julian Anastasov
2011-03-23 15:24 ` Stephen Hemminger
2011-03-09 21:28 ` David Miller
2011-03-03 0:56 ` Stephen Hemminger
2011-03-03 1:03 ` David Miller [this message]
2011-03-03 1:16 ` Stephen Hemminger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110302.170346.13723622.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).