netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Phil Oester <kernel@linuxace.com>
To: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	bhutchings@solarflare.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	fubar@us.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 net-next][v2] bonding: fix incorrect transmit queue offset
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2011 17:40:09 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110302014009.GA2045@linuxace.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110301153135.GL11864@gospo.rdu.redhat.com>

On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 10:31:36AM -0500, Andy Gospodarek wrote:
> > The patch works as expected.  Do we have any agreement on a final version?
> >
>
> Thanks for the testing, Phil.
>
> I'm in favor of this patch as it does alert the admin that bonding may
> not have enough default queues, but it is not as verbose (backtrace et
> al) and likely to create bug reports as a message from WARN_ON.
> +             if (net_ratelimit())
> +                     pr_warning("%s selects invalid tx queue %d.  Consider"
> +                                " setting module option tx_queues > %d.",
> +                                dev->name, txq, dev->real_num_tx_queues);

It is unclear why we need to alert the admin to this situation (repeatedly).  
Say the incoming nic has 32 queues, and is headed out a bond (with 16).
With your patch, we will log 50% of the time, no?  What benefit is this
log spew?

While WARN_ONCE may be a bit extreme due to the backtrace, perhaps we
should at least throw a 'static bool warned' variable in there to lessen
the nuisance?

Phil

  reply	other threads:[~2011-03-02  1:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-02-23 19:42 [PATCH 1/2] bonding: fix incorrect transmit queue offset Andy Gospodarek
2011-02-23 22:19 ` Jay Vosburgh
2011-02-23 23:12   ` Andy Gospodarek
2011-02-23 23:08 ` Phil Oester
2011-02-23 23:13   ` David Miller
2011-02-23 23:37     ` Ben Hutchings
2011-02-23 23:43       ` Andy Gospodarek
2011-02-23 23:54       ` David Miller
2011-02-25 22:56         ` Phil Oester
2011-03-01 15:31           ` [PATCH 1/2 net-next][v2] " Andy Gospodarek
2011-03-02  1:40             ` Phil Oester [this message]
2011-03-04 17:37               ` Jay Vosburgh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110302014009.GA2045@linuxace.com \
    --to=kernel@linuxace.com \
    --cc=andy@greyhouse.net \
    --cc=bhutchings@solarflare.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=fubar@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).