From: Phil Oester <kernel@linuxace.com>
To: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
bhutchings@solarflare.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
fubar@us.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 net-next][v2] bonding: fix incorrect transmit queue offset
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2011 17:40:09 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110302014009.GA2045@linuxace.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110301153135.GL11864@gospo.rdu.redhat.com>
On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 10:31:36AM -0500, Andy Gospodarek wrote:
> > The patch works as expected. Do we have any agreement on a final version?
> >
>
> Thanks for the testing, Phil.
>
> I'm in favor of this patch as it does alert the admin that bonding may
> not have enough default queues, but it is not as verbose (backtrace et
> al) and likely to create bug reports as a message from WARN_ON.
> + if (net_ratelimit())
> + pr_warning("%s selects invalid tx queue %d. Consider"
> + " setting module option tx_queues > %d.",
> + dev->name, txq, dev->real_num_tx_queues);
It is unclear why we need to alert the admin to this situation (repeatedly).
Say the incoming nic has 32 queues, and is headed out a bond (with 16).
With your patch, we will log 50% of the time, no? What benefit is this
log spew?
While WARN_ONCE may be a bit extreme due to the backtrace, perhaps we
should at least throw a 'static bool warned' variable in there to lessen
the nuisance?
Phil
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-02 1:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-23 19:42 [PATCH 1/2] bonding: fix incorrect transmit queue offset Andy Gospodarek
2011-02-23 22:19 ` Jay Vosburgh
2011-02-23 23:12 ` Andy Gospodarek
2011-02-23 23:08 ` Phil Oester
2011-02-23 23:13 ` David Miller
2011-02-23 23:37 ` Ben Hutchings
2011-02-23 23:43 ` Andy Gospodarek
2011-02-23 23:54 ` David Miller
2011-02-25 22:56 ` Phil Oester
2011-03-01 15:31 ` [PATCH 1/2 net-next][v2] " Andy Gospodarek
2011-03-02 1:40 ` Phil Oester [this message]
2011-03-04 17:37 ` Jay Vosburgh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110302014009.GA2045@linuxace.com \
--to=kernel@linuxace.com \
--cc=andy@greyhouse.net \
--cc=bhutchings@solarflare.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=fubar@us.ibm.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).