From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>
Subject: Re: bonding...
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2011 08:31:10 -0800
Message-ID: <20110303083110.4e7f020c@nehalam>
References: <20110302.214910.112578818.davem@davemloft.net>
	<1299159991.4277.45.camel@localhost>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>, fubar@us.ibm.com,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org
To: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com>
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail.vyatta.com ([76.74.103.46]:53896 "EHLO mail.vyatta.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1758373Ab1CCQbM (ORCPT <rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 3 Mar 2011 11:31:12 -0500
In-Reply-To: <1299159991.4277.45.camel@localhost>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>

On Thu, 03 Mar 2011 13:46:31 +0000
Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com> wrote:

> On Wed, 2011-03-02 at 21:49 -0800, David Miller wrote:
> [...]
> > This is unacceptable, people are submitting multiple bonding patches
> > every single day now.  It needs a clueful bonding person looking at
> > these submissions on a constant basis.
> [...]
> 
> And preferably saying 'no' to most new features...

Agreed. It seems bonding has diverged from the standards and wants
to support every packet flow some user can think up.