From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: rweikusat@mobileactivedefense.com
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: fix multithreaded signal handling in unix recv routines
Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2011 15:31:37 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110307.153137.212682178.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <877hck43hs.fsf@sapphire.mobileactivedefense.com>
From: Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@mobileactivedefense.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 14:50:55 +0000
> From: Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@mobileactivedefense.com>
>
> The unix_dgram_recvmsg and unix_stream_recvmsg routines in
> net/af_unix.c utilize mutex_lock(&u->readlock) calls in order to
> serialize read operations of multiple threads on a single socket. This
> implies that, if all n threads of a process block in an AF_UNIX recv
> call trying to read data from the same socket, one of these threads
> will be sleeping in state TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE and all others in state
> TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE. Provided that a particular signal is supposed to
> be handled by a signal handler defined by the process and that none of
> this threads is blocking the signal, the complete_signal routine in
> kernel/signal.c will select the 'first' such thread it happens to
> encounter when deciding which thread to notify that a signal is
> supposed to be handled and if this is one of the TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE
> threads, the signal won't be handled until the one thread not blocking
> on the u->readlock mutex is woken up because some data to process has
> arrived (if this ever happens). The included patch fixes this by
> changing mutex_lock to mutex_lock_interruptible and handling possible
> error returns in the same way interruptions are handled by the actual
> receive-code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@mobileactivedefense.com>
Looks good, applied, thanks.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-07 23:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-28 14:50 [PATCH] net: fix multithreaded signal handling in unix recv routines Rainer Weikusat
2011-02-28 15:07 ` fix multithreaded signal handling in unix recv routines/ background Rainer Weikusat
2011-03-07 23:31 ` David Miller [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110307.153137.212682178.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rweikusat@mobileactivedefense.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox