From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] Phonet: fix NULL-deref in
 a8059512b120362b15424f152b2548fe8b11bd0c
Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2011 13:34:21 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <20110308.133421.179935481.davem@davemloft.net>
References: <201103082259.41844.remi@remlab.net>
	<20110308.130926.246531377.davem@davemloft.net>
	<201103082330.31652.remi@remlab.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
To: remi@remlab.net
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:34930
	"EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK)
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754258Ab1CHVdn convert rfc822-to-8bit
	(ORCPT <rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 8 Mar 2011 16:33:43 -0500
In-Reply-To: <201103082330.31652.remi@remlab.net>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>

=46rom: "R=E9mi Denis-Courmont" <remi@remlab.net>
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 23:30:31 +0200

> Le mardi 8 mars 2011 23:09:26 David Miller, vous avez =E9crit :
>> From: "R=E9mi Denis-Courmont" <remi@remlab.net>
>> Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 22:59:41 +0200
>>=20
>> > I just wish you'd been as strict back then.
>>=20
>> The only thing worse that putting crappy code into the tree is havin=
g
>> patches rot in patchwork because the maintainer isn't responsive at
>> reviewing things.
>=20
> Patch submitted:
> Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 10:37:59 +0530
>=20
> Patch merged:
> Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 21:50:59 -0700
>=20
> So the patches had been "rotting" for 0 days 23:13:00. Come on.

I gave you nearly a full day.

If I do my daily email scan twice, and see the same patch on both
occaisions without a review I am very likely to merge the thing
or poke the maintainer.