Re: [patch net-next-2.6 4/8] bonding: wrap slave state work

[Jiri Pirko <jpirko@redhat.com>]

Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 08:55:12PM CET, nicolas.2p.debian@gmail.com wrote:
>Le 07/03/2011 10:58, Jiri Pirko a écrit :
>>>>
>>>>+static inline void bond_set_active_slave(struct slave *slave)
>>>>+{
>>>>+	slave->backup = 0;
>>>
>>>In the comment above, you said that the possible value for backup
>>>corresponds with BOND_STATE_ACTIVE and BOND_STATE_BACKUP.
>>>
>>>So, should be:
>>>
>>>slave->backup = BOND_STATE_ACTIVE;
>>>
>>>>+}
>>>>+
>>>>+static inline void bond_set_backup_slave(struct slave *slave)
>>>>+{
>>>>+	slave->backup = 1;
>>>
>>>slave->backup = BOND_STATE_BACKUP;
>>>
>>
>>Well, I think it's weird and misleading to assign some define to :1
>>bitfield. Should be 0 or 1, nothing else.
>
>Agreed, but the comment appears missleading... May be you should fix the comment, not the code.

Hmm. I thought that the comment is accurate. BOND_STATE_ACTIVE
corresponds with 0, BOND_STATE_BACKUP corresponds with 1. Anyway, let me
know how would you like to formulate this and I can repost (or do a
little comment-changing followup)

Thanks Nicolas

>
>	Nicolas.
>