From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jamie Iles Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/8] macb: support data bus widths > 32 bits Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 13:15:20 +0000 Message-ID: <20110311131520.GC7357@pulham.picochip.com> References: <1299751843-9743-1-git-send-email-jamie@jamieiles.com> <1299751843-9743-9-git-send-email-jamie@jamieiles.com> <20110311125523.GN9351@game.jcrosoft.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Jamie Iles , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, nicolas.ferre@atmel.com To: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD Return-path: Received: from mail-bw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.214.46]:42207 "EHLO mail-bw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753265Ab1CKNP2 (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Mar 2011 08:15:28 -0500 Received: by bwz15 with SMTP id 15so2655178bwz.19 for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 05:15:26 -0800 (PST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110311125523.GN9351@game.jcrosoft.org> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 01:55:23PM +0100, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > On 10:10 Thu 10 Mar , Jamie Iles wrote: > > Some GEM implementations may support data bus widths up to 128 bits. > > Allow the platform data to specify the data bus width and let the driver > > program it up. > > > can we detect it? Well, the first design configuration register will tell you what the maximum data bus width is so we could probably always go with that. I can't think of a good reason why you wouldn't want to do that. Jamie