From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: fcoe: correct checking for bonding Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2011 10:59:44 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <20110312.105944.193725929.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20110302095550.GA2858@psychotron.brq.redhat.com> <1299114558.1688.5.camel@fritz> <20110312120109.GA2899@psychotron.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: robert.w.love@intel.com, James.Bottomley@suse.de, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, devel@open-fcoe.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, fubar@us.ibm.com, joe.eykholt@gmail.com To: jpirko@redhat.com Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20110312120109.GA2899@psychotron.redhat.com> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org From: Jiri Pirko Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2011 13:01:10 +0100 > Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 02:09:18AM CET, robert.w.love@intel.com wrote: >>On Wed, 2011-03-02 at 01:55 -0800, Jiri Pirko wrote: >>> Or perhaps this should be applied to net-next? >>> >>I think this should go through scsi-misc as all the other >>libfc/libfcoe/fcoe patches do. >> >>> Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 07:05:35AM CET, jpirko@redhat.com wrote: >>> >Check for bonding master and refuse to use that. >>> > >>> >Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko >>> >--- >>> > drivers/scsi/fcoe/fcoe.c | 4 +--- >>> > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >>> > >>> >diff --git a/drivers/scsi/fcoe/fcoe.c b/drivers/scsi/fcoe/fcoe.c >>> >index 9f9600b..3becc6a 100644 >>> >--- a/drivers/scsi/fcoe/fcoe.c >>> >+++ b/drivers/scsi/fcoe/fcoe.c >>> >@@ -285,9 +285,7 @@ static int fcoe_interface_setup(struct fcoe_interface *fcoe, >>> > } >>> > >>> > /* Do not support for bonding device */ >>> >- if ((netdev->priv_flags & IFF_MASTER_ALB) || >>> >- (netdev->priv_flags & IFF_SLAVE_INACTIVE) || >>> >- (netdev->priv_flags & IFF_MASTER_8023AD)) { >>> >+ if (netdev->priv_flags & IFF_BONDING && netdev->flags & IFF_MASTER) { >>> > FCOE_NETDEV_DBG(netdev, "Bonded interfaces not supported\n"); >>> > return -EOPNOTSUPP; >>> > } >>> >-- >>> >1.7.3.4 >>> > >> >>James, feel free to pick up this patch. I don't have anything in my fcoe >>tree right now that it would conflict with. I'll also put it in my tree >>and resend if you don't put it into scsi-misc directly. > > What's the status of this? Maybe this should rather go thru net-next Sure, I can take this. I'll look at it later.