netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
	virtualization@lists.osdl.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] vhost-net: use lock_sock_fast() in peek_head_len()
Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2011 23:11:29 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110313211129.GA10235@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1300038092.2761.41.camel@edumazet-laptop>

On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 06:41:32PM +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Le dimanche 13 mars 2011 à 18:43 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin a écrit :
> > On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 05:32:07PM +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > > Le dimanche 13 mars 2011 à 18:19 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin a écrit :
> > > 
> > > > Other side is in drivers/net/tun.c and net/packet/af_packet.c
> > > > At least wrt tun it seems clear socket is not locked.
> > > 
> > > Yes (assuming you refer to tun_net_xmit())
> > > 
> > > > Besides queue, dequeue seems to be done without socket locked.
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > It seems this code (assuming you speak of drivers/vhost/net.c ?) has
> > > some races indeed.
> > > 
> > 
> > Hmm. Any more besides the one fixed here?
> > 
> 
> If writers and readers dont share a common lock, how can they reliably
> synchronize states ?

They are all supposed to use sk_receive_queue.lock I think.

> For example, the check at line 420 seems unsafe or useless.
> 
> skb_queue_empty(&sock->sk->sk_receive_queue)
> 

It's mostly useless: code that is called after this
 does skb_peek and checks the result under the spinlock.
This was supposed to be an optimization: quickly check
that queue is not empty before we bother disabling notifications
etc, but I dont' remember at this point whether it actually gives any gain.
Thanks for pointing this out, I'll take it out I think (below).
Note: there are two places of this call in upstream: handle_rx_bug and
handle_rx_mergeable, but they are merged into a single
handle_rx by a patch by Jason Wang.
The below patch is on top.
If you like to look at the latest code,
it's here master.kernel.org:/home/mst/pub/vhost.git
branch vhost-net-next has it all.

Eric, thanks very much for pointing out these.
Is there anything else that you see in this driver?


Thanks!


    vhost-net: remove unlocked use of receive_queue
    
    Use of skb_queue_empty(&sock->sk->sk_receive_queue)
    without taking the sk_receive_queue.lock is unsafe
    or useless. Take it out.
    
    Reported-by:  Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
    Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>

diff --git a/drivers/vhost/net.c b/drivers/vhost/net.c
index 5720301..2f7c76a 100644
--- a/drivers/vhost/net.c
+++ b/drivers/vhost/net.c
@@ -311,7 +311,7 @@ static void handle_rx(struct vhost_net *net)
 	/* TODO: check that we are running from vhost_worker? */
 	struct socket *sock = rcu_dereference_check(vq->private_data, 1);
 
-	if (!sock || skb_queue_empty(&sock->sk->sk_receive_queue))
+	if (!sock)
 		return;
 
 	mutex_lock(&vq->mutex);

  reply	other threads:[~2011-03-13 21:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-01-17  8:10 [PATCH 1/3] vhost-net: check the support of mergeable buffer outside the receive loop Jason Wang
2011-01-17  8:11 ` [PATCH 2/3] vhost-net: Unify the code of mergeable and big buffer handling Jason Wang
2011-01-17  8:36   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-01-18  3:05     ` Jason Wang
2011-01-18  4:37       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-01-18  7:41         ` Jason Wang
2011-01-17  8:11 ` [PATCH 3/3] vhost-net: use lock_sock_fast() in peek_head_len() Jason Wang
2011-01-17  9:33   ` Eric Dumazet
2011-01-17  9:57   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-03-13 15:06   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-03-13 15:52     ` Eric Dumazet
2011-03-13 16:19       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-03-13 16:32         ` Eric Dumazet
2011-03-13 16:43           ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-03-13 17:41             ` Eric Dumazet
2011-03-13 21:11               ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2011-01-17  8:46 ` [PATCH 1/3] vhost-net: check the support of mergeable buffer outside the receive loop Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-01-18  4:26   ` Jason Wang
2011-01-18  4:36     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-01-18  9:15       ` Jason Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110313211129.GA10235@redhat.com \
    --to=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).