From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: fcoe: correct checking for bonding
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 14:04:46 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <20110314.140446.183042229.davem@davemloft.net>
References: <20110314192201.GA2873@psychotron.redhat.com>
	<20110314.132007.193707878.davem@davemloft.net>
	<1300136015.31662.13.camel@mulgrave.site>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: jpirko@redhat.com, robert.w.love@intel.com,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, devel@open-fcoe.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, fubar@us.ibm.com, joe.eykholt@gmail.com
To: James.Bottomley@suse.de
Return-path: <linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <1300136015.31662.13.camel@mulgrave.site>
Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@suse.de>
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 15:53:35 -0500

> That said, I think we're pretty close to the end of the patch series
> for the merge window and it's a simple patch, so as long as it
> applies to net-next, I think we have an pretty low probability for
> non trivial merges.  You can do it with my and Rob's acked-by.

Ok, thanks.